Experiences of mental health practitioners after clients' suicide: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

Autor:	Du J; Center of Evidence-based Education and Arts Therapies: A JBI Affiliated Group, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic., Li J; Center of Evidence-based Education and Arts Therapies: A JBI Affiliated Group, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic., Kantor J; Center of Evidence-based Education and Arts Therapies: A JBI Affiliated Group, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic., Kabiri N; Iranian EBM Centre: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran., Svobodová Z; Center of Evidence-based Education and Arts Therapies: A JBI Affiliated Group, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic., Munn Z; Health Evidence Synthesis Recommendations and Impact (HESRI), School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	JBI evidence synthesis [JBI Evid Synth] 2024 Aug 28. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 28.
DOI:	10.11124/JBIES-23-00495
Abstrakt:	Objective: The objective of this qualitative systematic review will be to understand the experiences of mental health practitioners after clients' suicide. Introduction: Mental health practitioners inevitably encounter client suicide during their careers, which can significantly affect their personal lives and professional outcomes. A deeper understanding of mental health practitioners' experiences in the aftermath of clients' suicide is necessary to provide effective support and assist with adaptation to this situation. Inclusion Criteria: This systematic review will consider qualitative studies that explore the experiences of mental health practitioners, including psychotherapists, psychiatrists, psychological counselors, clinical psychologists, psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, and social workers following clients' suicide. Experiences may include emotional responses, coping strategies, changes in social relationships, and reflections on practice. Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for qualitative systematic reviews. The databases to be searched will include PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), SocINDEX (EBSCOhost), Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Bibliographia Medica Čechoslovaca, and Bibliographia Medica Slovaca. Gray literature sources will include Google Scholar, and ProQuest. Studies in English, Czech, Slovak, and Chinese will be assessed for inclusion regardless of publication date. Studies that are initially selected will be assessed for methodological quality using the JBI critical appraisal tool for qualitative studies. Then, findings with illustrations will be extracted for subsequent meta-aggregation and ConQual assessment. All the above steps will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Systematic Review Registration Number: PROSPERO CRD42023410523. Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on Behalf of JBI.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu