Construction of a decision model for donor testing in cases of suspected antibody-mediated transfusion-related-acute-lung-injury.
Autor: | Latham T; NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK., Bentley A; Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., Grey S; Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusts, Blackpool, UK., Malhotra P; Mersey and West Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Ormskirk., Davis PJ; University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Trust, Bristol, UK., Clarkson J; NHS Blood and transplant, Barnsley, UK., Poles A; NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK., Narayan S; NHS Blood and Transplant, Manchester, UK. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) [Transfus Med] 2024 Oct; Vol. 34 (5), pp. 405-412. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 26. |
DOI: | 10.1111/tme.13073 |
Abstrakt: | Objective: To propose a rational basis for donor testing in cases of suspected antibody-mediated transfusion-related lung injury (AMT). Background: Anti-leukocyte antibodies in donated blood are established causes of transfusion-related lung injury (TRALI). However, the question of whether to test donors for antibodies is not identical to whether the case meets definition criteria for TRALI. There is a balance between the potential benefits of testing and the costs of donor deferral and investigation. We propose that a decision-making process based on optimising the balance between risk and benefit requires a subjective choice of the relative value of different outcomes of testing. Methods: We have developed a formal decision model to illustrate how these choices affect testing decisions. Results: Using a Bayesian probability model, we show that the diagnostic benefit and TRALI prevention benefit of testing donors have a complex interrelationship with the number of implicated donors and clinical suspicion of antibody-mediated TRALI (AMT) and that rational testing choices vary according to value assigned to outcomes. Conclusions: The challenges to the use of a formal decision model for clinical testing are discussed and conclude that a formal model is a useful consensus-building tool for improving consistency and openness in decision making. (© 2024 The Author(s). Transfusion Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Blood Transfusion Society.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |