Pedagogical Implementation of Directive Feedback Manikins on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Competencies: Expert Versus Peer Coaching.
| Autor: | Pellegrino JL; Disaster Science and Emergency Services, The University of Akron, Akron, USA., Back A; Disaster Science and Emergency Services, The University of Akron, Akron, USA., Chan A; Health Education Solutions, Canadian Red Cross, Ottawa, CAN., Muise J; Health Education Solutions, Canadian Red Cross, Ottawa, CAN. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Cureus [Cureus] 2024 Jul 23; Vol. 16 (7), pp. e65181. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 23 (Print Publication: 2024). |
| DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.65181 |
| Abstrakt: | Background: Directive feedback manikins in resuscitation training evolved faster than the pedagogical evidence. Educators and learning systems must seek clarification on the efficacy of this technology to have evidence-based practices. This project explores directive feedback device use in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education for laypersons. Methods: A prospective nonrandomized-controlled design assessed two pedagogical approaches of directive feedback manikins in adult CPR lessons. The 230 participants were distributed between three groups: a control group without directive feedback manikins (no lights, NL), an expert coaching (EC) group with directive feedback and educator interpretation, and a peer coaching (PC) group with directive feedback, peer interpretation, and expert quality assurance. Results: From the 25 courses observed, average compression depth (mm) did not differ between groups ( p = .498), average compression rate (compressions: minute) significantly differed between groups ( p = .004), and correct hand placement did not differ between groups ( p = .249). A chi-square test showed no significant association between groups and CPR skill feedback, or between groups and "recommending the course to a friend or family member." The PC group was more likely to agree that they could "coach someone to do CPR skills" than the NL or EC. Conclusions: This study expands the knowledge base of directive feedback manikins in a pedagogical setting to improve CPR competencies. Training organizations may consider any of these practices effective, choosing those that align with desired outcomes. CPR educators need orientation to feedback devices as well as professional development on educational options for their use. Considerations for further research include technology costs, access, and cultural aspects of implementing these tools. Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The University of Akron issued approval 20210413. The University of Akron Institutional Review Board approved this research. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: The Canadian Red Cross funded the research by the Resiliency Behaviors Lab at the University of Akron. Innosonian.us donated Brayden Pro manikins for data collection, and Prestan Products donated feedback manikins. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. (Copyright © 2024, Pellegrino et al.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|