Risk and protective factors of youth crime: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Autor: Ayano G; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia. Electronic address: g.yaya@curtin.edu.au., Rooney R; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Pollard CM; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Dantas JAR; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Lobo R; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Jeemi Z; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Burns S; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Cunningham R; Curtin Law School, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Monterosso S; Curtin Law School, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Millar L; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia; Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, WA, Australia., Hassan S; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Dovchin S; School of Education, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Oliver R; School of Education, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Coleman K; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia., Alati R; School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia; Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical psychology review [Clin Psychol Rev] 2024 Nov; Vol. 113, pp. 102479. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 19.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102479
Abstrakt: Introduction: Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted on the risk and protective factors of youth crime. This study aims to consolidate this evidence using an umbrella review methodology.
Methods: A systematic electronic search was conducted using multiple electronic databases. Strength of associations was evaluated using quantitative umbrella review criteria, and AMSTAR was used to assess the quality of the studies.
Results: Among the 58 factors identified, 11 factors were supported by highly suggestive or suggestive evidence. Evidence of association was highly suggestive (class II) for substance use (odds ratio [OR] = 2·29, 95%CI 1·58-3.01), previous history of crime (OR = 2·03, 95%CI 1·62-2·45), moral development (OR = 3·98, 95%CI 3·57-4·39), psychopathology (OR = 2·22, 95%CI 1.40-2.69), adverse childhood experiences (OR = 1·37, 95%CI = 1·36-1·38), poor parental supervision (OR = 1·85, 95%CI 1·83-1·87), maltreatment or neglect (OR = 1·34, 95%CI 1·08-1·65), attachment (OR = 1·94; 95%CI 1.93-1·95), and school bullying (OR = 2·50; 95%CI 2·03-3·08); and suggestive (class III) for peer pressure (OR = 2·11, 95%CI 2·06-2·16) and supportive school environments (OR = 0·56; 95%CI 0·55-0·57).
Conclusion: The evidence-based atlas of key risk and protective factors identified in this umbrella review could be used as a benchmark for advancing research, prevention, and early intervention strategies for youth crime.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None.
(Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: