ESPEN practical guideline on clinical nutrition in hospitalized patients with acute or chronic kidney disease.
Autor: | Sabatino A; Division of Renal Medicine, Baxter Novum. Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology. Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: alice.sabatino@ki.se., Fiaccadori E; Nephrology Unit, Parma University Hospital, & Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy., Barazzoni R; Internal Medicine, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy., Carrero JJ; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden., Cupisti A; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy., De Waele E; Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Vitality Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Unversiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium., Jonckheer J; Department of intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brussel (UZB), Brussels, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussel, Belgium., Cuerda C; Nutrition Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; Department of Medicine. Universidad Complutense. Madrid, Spain., Bischoff SC; Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) [Clin Nutr] 2024 Sep; Vol. 43 (9), pp. 2238-2254. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 20. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.08.002 |
Abstrakt: | Background and Aims: Hospitalized patients often have acute kidney disease (AKD) or chronic kidney disease (CKD), with important metabolic and nutritional consequences. Moreover, in case kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is started, the possible impact on nutritional requirements cannot be neglected. On this regard, the present guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical nutrition in hospitalized patients with KD. Methods: The standard operating procedure for ESPEN guidelines was used. Clinical questions were defined in both the PICO format, and organized in subtopics when needed, and in non-PICO questions for the more general topics. The literature search was from January 1st, 1999 until January 1st, 2020. Each question led to one or more recommendation/statement and related commentaries. Existing evidence was graded, as well as recommendations and statements were developed and agreed upon in a multistage consensus process. Results: The present guideline provides 32 evidence-based recommendations and 8 statements, defining how to assess nutritional status, how to define patients at risk, how to choose the route of feeding, and how to integrate nutrition with KRT. In the final online voting, a strong consensus was reached in 84% at least of recommendations and 100% of statements. Conclusion: The presence of KD in hospitalized patients identifies a highly heterogeneous group of subjects with widely varying nutrient needs and intakes. Considering the high nutritional risk related with this clinical condition, an individualized approach consisting of nutritional status evaluation and monitoring, frequent evaluation of nutritional requirements, and careful integration with KRT should be planned to avoid both underfeeding and overfeeding. Practical recommendations and statements were developed, aiming at defining suggestions for everyday clinical practice in the individualization of nutritional support in this patient setting. Literature areas with scarce or without evidence were also identified, thus requiring further basic or clinical research. Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The expert members of the working group were accredited by the ESPEN Guidelines Group, the ESPEN Education and Clinical Practice Committee, and the ESPEN executive. All expert members have declared their individual conflicts of interest according to the rules of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). If potential conflicts were indicated, they were reviewed by the ESPEN guideline officers and, in cases of doubts, by the ESPEN executive. None of the expert panel had to be excluded from the working group or from co-authorship because of serious conflicts. The conflict of interest forms are stored at the ESPEN guideline office and can be reviewed with legitimate interest upon request to the ESPEN executive. (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |