What Free Flaps Are Surgeons Using for Palatal Fistula Repair in Patients with Cleft Palate? A Systematic Review.

Autor:	Zheng EE; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA., Gates-Tanzer L; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA., Cherukuri S; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA., Mardini S; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA., Murad MH; Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA., Bite U; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA., Gibreel W; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association [Cleft Palate Craniofac J] 2024 Aug 23, pp. 10556656241266243. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 23.
DOI:	10.1177/10556656241266243
Abstrakt:	Objective: Recalcitrant palatal fistulas in patients with cleft palate history sometimes require free flap reconstruction. This study reviews the literature on described flaps and outcomes. Design: A systematic review was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Setting: All study designs were included. Non-English articles were excluded. Patients and Participants: Patients with a history of cleft palate who underwent free flap reconstruction for a oronasal fistula. Interventions: Free tissue transfer for a palatal fistula repair. Main Outcomee Measures: Information regarding defect and flap characteristics were reviewed. Surgical outcomes such as flap loss rates, rates of recurrent fistula formation, and speech outcomes were also obtained. Results: Our search returned 894 articles, of which 23 were included. All studies were retrospective case series and reports. A total of 65 patients were described with an average age of 19.3 (range 3-55) years and a median fistula size of 8.00 cm 2 (range 2.54 cm 2 - 24 cm 2 ). The most common flap was the radial forearm flap (n = 37). Nine patients (13.8%) had recurrent fistula formation with surgical revision successful in all cases in which the patient returned to the operating room. There were two partial flap losses and no total flap losses. Speech outcomes showed improvement in 27 patients across 10 studies. Conclusions: Palatal fistula repair with free tissue transfer is safe with an acceptable risk profile and low flap loss rate. Early recurrence due to partial flap necrosis and dehiscence are successfully managed with flap readvancement. Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu