A comparison of dynamic warm-up and "warm-up" using self-massage tools on subsequent sit-and-reach displacement.

Autor: Aquino M; Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York, United States of America., DiMenna F; Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York, United States of America., Petrizzo J; Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York, United States of America., Yusuff G; Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York, United States of America., Otto RM; Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York, United States of America., Wygand J; Department of Health and Sport Sciences, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York, United States of America.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: PloS one [PLoS One] 2024 Aug 22; Vol. 19 (8), pp. e0307073. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 22 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307073
Abstrakt: Objectives: A dynamic warm-up (DWU) comprising exercise involving rhythmic muscle actions results in an acute increase in range of motion; however, recent findings suggest that a passive one using self-massage techniques might elicit a similar effect. This study's purpose was to compare the acute effect of leg cycling DWU on sit-and-reach score to the effect of a preparatory regimen of foam rolling (FR) or percussive massage (PM).
Design: Single-blind, randomized, repeated-measures crossover study.
Methods: Thirty-two asymptomatic, physically-active participants (male; n = 17) aged 20.9 ± 1.5 years performed sit-and-reach tests before, immediately following and 10-, 20- and 30-minutes following eight minutes of each of the "warm-ups." Analyses of variance at each time point across conditions and for the percent change elicited by each intervention were conducted to determine significant differences (p < 0.05).
Results: Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant difference between mean percent difference of sit-and-reach score for FR (8.8 ± 0.5%) compared to DWU and PM (p = 0.046 and 0.048, respectively) while DWU (6.3 ± 0.8%) and PM (6.8 ± 0.5%) did not differ (p = 0.717). There were no differences between scores across interventions at any of the four time points.
Conclusions: A bout of FR or PM resulted in an acute increase in a sit-and-reach score during a test performed immediately post and at 10-, 20- and 30-minutes post that was similar in magnitude to that which was present following leg cycling. These passive "warm-ups" are appropriate alternate strategies that can be employed to improve performance on a sit-and-reach test.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2024 Aquino et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje