Ability of detection in different resolution endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions.

Autor: Jin X; The First School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China., Zhou Q; The First School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China., Lyu B; Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, 310060, China., Zhang C; Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, 310060, China., Huang L; Department of Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Youdian Street 54, Hangzhou, 310060, China. 361765832@qq.com.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Surgical endoscopy [Surg Endosc] 2024 Oct; Vol. 38 (10), pp. 5903-5913. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 21.
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11186-y
Abstrakt: Background: Most endoscopists believe that higher resolution improves lesion detection rates. However, existing studies primarily compared the detection rates of white light endoscopy (WLE) and other imaging modalities. Our previous study demonstrated the advantages of magnifying endoscopy from general endoscopy for lesion detection, prompting further investigation into the variations in lesion detection rates across endoscopes with different resolutions.
Methods: Endoscopic and corresponding pathological data from our medical unit over the past 5 years were analyzed. We excluded specific-purpose endoscopic procedures to ensure the natural randomization of the data. Baseline adjustment and risk factor analyses used multi-group propensity score matching and logistic regression.
Results: The overall lesion detection rate was significantly higher with high-quality endoscopy (Q-endoscopy) compared to high-definition endoscopy (H-endoscopy) and high definition and quality endoscopy (HQ-endoscopy) (34.4% vs. 30.2% vs. 29.6%, P = 0.001). Similar results were observed for elevated lesions (25.7% vs. 21.0% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.001) and depressed lesions (6.6% vs. 6.2% vs. 3.6%, P < 0.001). HQ-endoscopy had a superior detection rate for superficial lesions compared to both H- and Q-endoscopies (3.0% vs. 2.8% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.041). However, there were no significant differences in neoplastic detection rate or missed neoplastic lesion rate among the three groups.
Conclusion: Q-endoscopy is superior in detecting non-superficial lesions, while HQ-endoscopy is better at detecting superficial lesions. However, there were no statistically significant differences in detecting or omitting neoplastic lesions among the three endoscopic examinations.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: