Instruments for evaluating the quality of services in chronic diseases: scoping review.

Autor:	Sousa GS; Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil., Silva FVD; Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil., Longhi FG; Universidade de São Paulo, Biblioteca da Faculdade de Enfermagem, São Paulo, SP, Brazil., Cortela DDCB; Universidade do Estado do Mato Grosso, Faculdade de Medicina, Cáceres, MT, Brazil., Silva PRS; Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil., Ferreira SMB; Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.
Jazyk:	English; Portuguese; Spanish; Castilian
Zdroj:	Revista latino-americana de enfermagem [Rev Lat Am Enfermagem] 2024 Aug 19; Vol. 32, pp. e4293. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 19 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI:	10.1590/1518-8345.7168.4293
Abstrakt:	Objective: to map the scientific literature on the validity of instruments for evaluating the quality of services provided in primary health care for chronic diseases related to systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, leprosy and tuberculosis. Method: scoping review, following the Joanna Briggs Institute method and described in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. 13 databases and gray literature were included. The selection of studies was carried out after removing duplicates and individual and paired evaluation. The data was extracted based on an elaborate script and presented in tables and charts. Results: the analysis of 28 selected studies showed that the majority were from Brazil, followed by China and Malaysia. Almost half of the validated instruments were generic, and the specific ones covered the evaluation of diabetes mellitus and leprosy. The types of validation carried out were content and construct. Conclusion: there is a need to construct specific instruments due to the scarcity of studies on the process of validating instruments for evaluating the quality of services provided by primary health care for chronic diseases. Highlights: (1) Validated instruments for evaluating services in chronic diseases.(2) Possibility of carrying out new studies on adaptations of PCAT and PACIC.(3) No evaluation was identified for minors under 18 years of age with chronic diseases.(4) Use of a generic instrument to evaluate specific chronic diseases.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu