Donor Perceptions and Preferences of Telemedicine and In-Person Visits for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation.

Autor:	Kim E; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA., Sung HC; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA., Kaplow K; Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA., Bendersky V; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA., Sidoti C; Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA., Muzaale AD; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA., Akhtar J; Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA., Levan M; Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA., Esayed S; Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, California, USA., Khan A; Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA., Mejia C; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA., Al Ammary F; Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, California, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Kidney international reports [Kidney Int Rep] 2024 May 15; Vol. 9 (8), pp. 2453-2461. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 May 15 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI:	10.1016/j.ekir.2024.05.009
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Living kidney donor evaluation is a lengthy and complex process requiring in-person visits. Access to transplant centers, travel costs, lost wages, and dependent care arrangements are barriers to willing donors initiating evaluation. Telemedicine can help streamline and epedite the evaluation process. We aimed to deeply understand donor experiences and preferences using hybrid telemedicine video/in-person visits to ease access to donor evaluation or counseling. Methods: We conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with donors or donor candidates who completed their evaluation through telemedicine/in-person, or in-person only visits at a tertiary transplant center between November 27, 2019 and March 1, 2021. Enrollment continued until data saturation was reached (interviews with 20 participants) when no new information emerged from additional interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Eight themes were identified as follows: (i) reducing financial and logistical burdens (minimizing travel time and travel-related expenses), (ii) enhancing flexibility with scheduling (less time off work and child or family caregiver arrangements), (iii) importance of a walkthrough and establishing shared understanding, (iv) supporting information with technology and visual aids, (v) key role of the coordinator, (vi) preferred visit by provider role (meeting donor surgeon in-person to create rapport and engaging primary care provider in donor evaluation/follow-up), (vii) comparing modality differences in human connection, and (viii) opportunity for family and support network engagement (allowing loved ones to be involved in telemedicine visits irrespective of geographic locations and pandemic restrictions). Conclusion: Telemedicine/in-person hybrid model can make donor evaluation more accessible and convenient. Our findings help inform about determinants that influence the adoption of telemedicine to initiate donor evaluation to motivate willing donors. In addition, our results call for policy and legislation that support telemedicine services for living donor kidney transplantation across states. (© 2024 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu