Evidence on psychometric properties of self-report questionnaires in evaluating blended learning in health sciences university students: research protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Autor:	Dones VC 3rd; Department of Physical Therapy-College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.; Center for Health Research and Movement Science - JBI Affiliated Group, University of Santo Tomas, Metro Manila, Philippines., Dalusong MTB; Department of Physical Therapy, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila College of Physical Therapy, Manila, Philippines., Manlapaz D; Department of Physical Therapy-College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines., Rojas JA; Department of Physical Therapy-College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines joseangelo.monreal.crs@ust.edu.ph juanalfonso.rojas.crs@ust.edu.ph., Ho KC; Department of Physical Therapy-College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines., Reyes JJ; Department of Physical Therapy-College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines., Sangatanan LB; Department of Physical Therapy-College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines., Narcelles AM; Department of Physical Therapy-College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines., Ballesteros MBBP; Department of Physical Therapy-College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines., Flores RKS; Department of Physical Therapy-College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines., Monreal JA; Department of Physical Therapy-College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines joseangelo.monreal.crs@ust.edu.ph juanalfonso.rojas.crs@ust.edu.ph.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2024 Aug 17; Vol. 14 (8), pp. e075266. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 17.
DOI:	10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075266
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Due to the COVID-19 outbreak, schools had to switch online. As universities ease face-to-face (F2F) schooling, blended teaching and learning (BTL) enables the continuous delivery of education. However, the sudden transition to BTL poses challenges for students and teachers, especially for health sciences programmes that require hands-on practical experience. Several studies have evaluated F2F teaching and learning contexts through student feedback and evaluations. However, there needs to be more reliable and valid self-report questionnaires that focus on the perceptions and experiences of students experiencing BTL. This study will critically appraise, compare and summarise the quality of self-report questionnaires evaluating BTL among health science university students based on their psychometric properties. Methods and Analysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis design will be used. This review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols and follow the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) standardised guidelines. 13 databases will be searched for studies reporting BTL self-report questionnaires as evaluation tools with their respective psychometric properties. Two independent reviewers will appraise the paper using the COSMIN risk of bias checklist and the quality of evidence of the psychometric properties of the relevant questionnaires will be assessed using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Based on their psychometric properties, these assessments will comprehensively summarise and present the best recommendations for the most appropriate self-report questionnaires for BTL evaluation. Ethics and Dissemination: The University of the Philippines' Research Grants Administration Office exempted this research protocol from ethics review evaluation (protocol number UPMREB 2022-0259-EX) since this study will not collect individual data. The research protocol was registered with PROSPERO. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences to aid researchers and professionals in the field of health education to prudently choose effective self-report questionnaires evaluating blended learning.CRD42022372362. Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors of this research protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis declare that we received funding from the National Research Council of the Philippines of the Department of Science and Technology. However, the grant giving body did not influence the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation or reporting of this study. The authors are affiliated with the University of Santo Tomas, the University of the Philippines - Manila and the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila. We affirm that our primary objective was to produce an unbiased and rigorous synthesis of the available evidence on the topic under investigation, adhering to the highest ethical and methodological standards throughout the research process. We do not own any patents, stocks, shares or other financial assets that the findings of this study might affect. Our affiliations do not pose any conflicts of interest that could influence the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis. We have disclosed all relevant information concerning potential conflicts of interest, including the funding from the National Research Council of the Philippines of the Department of Science and Technology and our affiliations with the aforementioned universities, to our institutional review board and have obtained their approval for this research protocol. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu