| Autor: |
Martignago CCS; Department of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo - Unifesp, Silva Jardim, Santos, Brazil., Bonifacio M; Department of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo - Unifesp, Silva Jardim, Santos, Brazil., Ascimann LT; Department of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo - Unifesp, Silva Jardim, Santos, Brazil., Vassão PG; Department of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo - Unifesp, Silva Jardim, Santos, Brazil., Parisi JR; Department of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo - Unifesp, Silva Jardim, Santos, Brazil., Renno AP; Department of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo - Unifesp, Silva Jardim, Santos, Brazil., Garcia LA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Science and Technology of Brazil University (UB), Rua Carolina Fonseca, São Paulo, Brazil., Ribeiro DA; Department of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo - Unifesp, Silva Jardim, Santos, Brazil., Renno ACM; Department of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo - Unifesp, Silva Jardim, Santos, Brazil. |
| Abstrakt: |
Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterised by facial erythema, oedema, telangiectasias, papules, pustules and nodules. There is a paucity of effective therapeutic modalities for the management of rosacea. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), a modality in which flash lamps installed in an optical treatment device (head or tip) with mirrors to reflect light, has in recent times gained popularity in the management of this condition. Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of IPL treatment for rosacea. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The electronic databases searched were Medline, PubMed and Scopus databases. The Risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and risk-of-bias tools for randomised trials (RoB-2) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Of a total of 233 articles retrieved from Medline, Scopus and PubMed databases, 14 studies qualified for final analysis. The studies included patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV, with ages ranging from 15 to 78 years. Although the included studies showed heterogeneity between the parameters used, most studies demonstrated positive effects of IPL treatment on telangiectasia and erythema in rosacea and that the adverse effects presented were transitory. Limitation The methodological quality of the included studies was poor. Conclusion Although most studies showed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of rosacea, the poor quality of the studies was of concern. |
