Research Review: Why do prospective and retrospective measures of maltreatment differ? A narrative review.

Autor: Coleman O; Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK., Baldwin JR; Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.; Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK., Dalgleish T; Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Fulbourn, UK., Rose-Clarke K; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK., Widom CS; Psychology Department, John Jay College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.; Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA., Danese A; Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.; National and Specialist CAMHS Clinic for Trauma, Anxiety, and Depression, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines [J Child Psychol Psychiatry] 2024 Dec; Vol. 65 (12), pp. 1662-1677. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 16.
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.14048
Abstrakt: Background: Childhood maltreatment contributes to a large mental health burden worldwide. Different measures of childhood maltreatment are not equivalent and may capture meaningful differences. In particular, prospective and retrospective measures of maltreatment identify different groups of individuals and are differentially associated with psychopathology. However, the reasons behind these discrepancies have not yet been comprehensively mapped.
Methods: In this review, we draw on multi-disciplinary research and present an integrated framework to explain maltreatment measurement disagreement.
Results: We identified three interrelated domains. First, methodological issues related to measurement and data collection methods. Second, the role of memory in influencing retrospective reports of maltreatment. Finally, the motivations individuals may have to disclose, withhold, or fabricate information about maltreatment.
Conclusions: A greater understanding of maltreatment measurement disagreement may point to new ways to conceptualise and assess maltreatment. Furthermore, it may help uncover mechanisms underlying maltreatment-related psychopathology and targets for novel interventions.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: