Prenatal Care Clinician Preferences Among Patients With Spanish-Preferred Language.
| Autor: | Butler HM; Harvard Medical School, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú., Bazan M, Rivera L, Salinas KE, Hacker MR, DeLevie-Orey S, Siegel MR, Larson E, Molina RL |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Obstetrics and gynecology [Obstet Gynecol] 2024 Oct 01; Vol. 144 (4), pp. 517-525. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 15. |
| DOI: | 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005697 |
| Abstrakt: | Objective: To measure what patients with Spanish language preference and limited English proficiency value most when selecting a prenatal care clinician. Methods: A discrete choice experiment was administered at two large academic medical centers in Boston, Massachusetts. Participants were identified by electronic medical record, had preferred Spanish language and self-identified limited English proficiency, and either were pregnant with a completed fetal anatomy scan or had given birth within the past 12 months at the time of the study. The discrete choice experiment consisted of eight attributes to consider when selecting a prenatal care clinician: clinician Spanish proficiency, type of interpreter used, interpersonal dynamics (ie, making patients feel seen, heard, and cared for), cultural concordance, continuity of care, shared decision making, distance from home, and wait times for appointments. Descriptive statistics of demographic variables were calculated. Hierarchical Bayesian models were used to analyze discrete choice experiment data. Results: The attributes that were most important to 166 participants when choosing their prenatal care clinician were interpersonal dynamics within the patient-clinician dyad and clinician Spanish language proficiency (average importance 21.4/100 and 20.8/100, respectively). Of lowest importance were wait time to receive an appointment and continuity of care (average importance 5.1 and 6.1, respectively). Although participants highly preferred that their clinician be "fluent or near fluent in Spanish," the second most preferred option was having a clinician with only basic Spanish proficiency rather than a more advanced level of Spanish proficiency with some misunderstandings. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the importance of positive clinician-patient interpersonal dynamics and language-concordant care for patients with Spanish language preference in prenatal care. Promoting equitable patient-centered care for patients with limited English proficiency requires responding to preferences regarding clinician language proficiency and demonstrating attentiveness, empathy, and concern for prenatal care experiences. Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure Michele R. Hacker disclosed that her institution received funding from the NIH, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Marriott Foundation. Elysia Larson disclosed that her institution received funding from NIMHD (1R01MD016026), NIMH (1K01MH133966), and CARE USA. Her institution also received funding from Harvard University through the Eleanor and Miles Shore Faculty Development Award. She has been a consultant to the World Bank for projects unrelated to the current submission. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest. (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|