Intraoperative Subperiosteal Elevation of the Ulnar Nerve Is a Safe and Effective Way to Minimize Postoperative Ulnar Neuritis in Distal Humerus Fractures.

Autor:	Sinkler MA; Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH., Fortier LM; Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH., Ayad M; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH., Arza R; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH., Napora J; Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH., Ochenjele G; Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of orthopaedic trauma [J Orthop Trauma] 2024 Nov 01; Vol. 38 (11), pp. 622-628.
DOI:	10.1097/BOT.0000000000002898
Abstrakt:	Objectives: To describe subperiosteal elevation of the ulnar nerve and compare to anterior transposition and in situ decompression techniques. Design: Retrospective comparative study. Setting: Urban Level 1 trauma center. Patient Selection Criteria: Distal humerus fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association/AO 13) treated with open reduction internal fixation between 2014 and 2022. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Rate of preoperative and postoperative neuritis grouped by the management of the ulnar nerve. During subperiosteal elevation, the ulnar nerve was identified and raised off the ulna subperiosteally and mobilized submuscularly anterior to the medial epicondyle to protect the nerve. The nerve was released only laterally off the triceps, and the medial soft tissue attachment is maintained. The main outcome measurements was rate of neuritis documented within physical examination. Results: Within the 125 patients, 35 underwent subperiosteal elevation (mean age of 56 ± 21 years, 57% female), 63 in situ decompression (mean age of 60 ± 18 years, 46% female), and 27 anterior transposition (mean age of 55 ± 20 years, 59% female). Preoperative ulnar neuritis was present in 34%, 21%, and 33% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively ( P = 0.26). At postoperative evaluation, symptom resolution occurred in 100%, 69%, and 33% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively ( P = 0.003). New cases of postoperative ulnar neuritis occurred in 6%, 8%, and 26% of patients treated with subperiosteal elevation, in situ decompression, and anterior transposition, respectively ( P = 0.054). Subperiosteal elevation outperformed anterior transposition regarding postoperative ulnar neuritis ( P = 0.019) and symptom resolution ( P = 0.002) and performed similarly to in situ decompression ( P > 0.05). On multiple regression analysis, anterior transposition was an independent risk factor for postoperative neuritis (OR = 5.2, P = 0.023). Conclusions: Subperiosteal elevation is an effective way to minimize postoperative neuritis and similar to an in situ decompression during distal humerus fracture fixation. Based on the results of this cohort, authors recommended that anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve be used with caution due to its association with postoperative ulnar neuritis. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest. (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu