A Comparative Study of Outcomes of Submucosal Diathermy Versus Inferior Turbinoplasty in Patients With Deviated Nasal Septum With Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy.

Autor:	Shinde V; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND., Kothari A; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND., Ingale M; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND., Satav A; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, IND.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Cureus [Cureus] 2024 Jul 11; Vol. 16 (7), pp. e64301. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 11 (Print Publication: 2024).
DOI:	10.7759/cureus.64301
Abstrakt:	Introduction Nasal obstruction due to deviated nasal septum (DNS) and inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH) is a common problem necessitating surgical intervention. Submucosal diathermy (SMD) and inferior turbinoplasty (IT) are two commonly performed procedures aimed at improving nasal patency. Methods A prospective comparative study was conducted on 56 patients with DNS and inferior turbinate hypertrophy, divided into SMD and inferior turbinoplasty groups. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included symptom assessment using the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) questionnaire. Results Both procedures led to significant improvements in nasal symptoms and quality of life. Inferior turbinoplasty showed slightly better outcomes in symptom improvement compared to submucosal diathermy. Conclusions Inferior turbinoplasty appears to offer slightly better outcomes in improving nasal symptoms compared to SMD in patients with DNS and inferior turbinate hypertrophy. However, both procedures are effective and safe options for surgical management. Individualized treatment decisions should consider patient preferences and surgeon expertise. Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Institutional Ethics Committee of Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, issued approval IESC/PGS/2022/121. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. (Copyright © 2024, Shinde et al.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu