Modeling the population health impact of accurate and inaccurate perceptions of harm from nicotine.

Autor: Hannel T; Altria Client Services LLC Center for Research and Technology, 601 E. Jackson Street, 23219, Richmond, VA, USA., Wei L; Altria Client Services LLC Center for Research and Technology, 601 E. Jackson Street, 23219, Richmond, VA, USA., Muhammad-Kah RS; Altria Client Services LLC Center for Research and Technology, 601 E. Jackson Street, 23219, Richmond, VA, USA., Largo EG; Altria Client Services LLC Center for Research and Technology, 601 E. Jackson Street, 23219, Richmond, VA, USA., Sarkar M; Altria Client Services LLC Center for Research and Technology, 601 E. Jackson Street, 23219, Richmond, VA, USA. mohamadi.sarkar@altria.com.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Harm reduction journal [Harm Reduct J] 2024 Aug 09; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 145. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 09.
DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-01059-x
Abstrakt: Background: Scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that inhaling the smoke from the combustion of cigarettes is responsible for most of the harm caused by smoking, and not the nicotine. However, a majority of U.S. adults who smoke inaccurately believe that nicotine causes cancer which may be a significant barrier, preventing switching to potentially reduced risk, non-combustible products like electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and smokeless tobacco (ST). We assessed the population health impact associated with nicotine perceptions.
Methods: Using a previously validated agent-based model to the U.S. population, we analyzed nationally representative data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study to estimate base case rates of sustained (maintained over four waves) cessation and switching to non-combustible product use, by sex. Nicotine perception scenarios were determined from PATH data. The overall switch rate from smoking in Wave 4 to non-combustible product use in Wave 5 (3.94%) was stratified based on responses to the nicotine perception question "Do you believe nicotine is the chemical that causes most of the cancer caused by smoking cigarettes?", (four-item scale from "Definitely not" to "Definitely yes"). The relative percent change between the overall and stratified rates, corresponding to each item, was used to adjust the base case rates of switching, to determine the impact, if all adults who smoke exhibited switching behaviors based on responses to the nicotine perceptions question. The public health impact of nicotine perceptions was estimated as the difference in all-cause mortality between the base case and the four nicotine perception scenarios.
Results: Switch rates associated with those who responded, "Definitely not" (8.39%) resulted in a net benefit of preventing nearly 800,000 premature deaths over an 85-year period. Conversely switch rates reflective of those who responded, "Definitely yes" (2.59%) resulted in a net harm of nearly 300,000 additional premature deaths over the same period.
Conclusions: Accurate knowledge regarding the role of nicotine is associated with higher switch rates and prevention of premature deaths. Our findings suggest that promoting public education to correct perceptions of harm from nicotine has the potential to benefit public health.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje