The effect of early childhood non-nutritive sucking behavior including pacifiers on malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.

Autor:	Arpalahti I; University of Turku, Faculty of Medicine, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, 20520 Turku.; Institute of Dentistry, Department of Community Dentistry, Turku, Finland., Hänninen K; Orthodontics, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 1, 00290 Helsinki, Finland., Tolvanen M; University of Turku, Faculty of Medicine, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, 20520 Turku.; Institute of Dentistry, Department of Community Dentistry, Turku, Finland.; National Rescue Services College, PL 1122 (Hulkontie 83), 70821 Kuopio, Finland., Varrela J; University of Turku, Faculty of Medicine, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, 20520 Turku.; Institute of Dentistry, Department of Community Dentistry, Turku, Finland., Rice DP; Orthodontics, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 1, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	European journal of orthodontics [Eur J Orthod] 2024 Oct 01; Vol. 46 (5).
DOI:	10.1093/ejo/cjae024
Abstrakt:	Background/rationale: Systematic reviews on the effects of pacifiers on occlusion have highlighted the need for quality RCTs. Trial Design: Single region, three parallel-armed, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Objectives: To investigate the correlations between early childhood non-nutritive sucking habits and malocclusion. Specifically to test whether the use of a study pacifier has differing effects compared to other pacifiers and control, and whether the duration of pacifier use or digit sucking influence the occlusion. Participants: The subjects were firstborn children, born in 2008 in Vantaa, Finland. Intervention: One-third of participants were offered study pacifiers, free of charge, from birth up to 2 years of age. The history of the subjects' sucking habits, including pacifier use was screened in a questionnaire at the age of 2 years, and clinical examinations were performed at the age of 7 years. In addition, the subjects were divided into groups that were equally matched regarding their mother's level of education. Outcomes: Posterior crossbite, anterior crossbite, overjet, deep bite, open bite, and crowding. Randomization Method: Three districts were randomly allocated to three study groups by drawing lots. Blinding: It was not possible to blind the clinicians or parents from the intervention. Blinding during data analysis was performed. Results: From the original cohort of 2715 children born in the town of Vantaa, 1911 were excluded and 353 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 451 children were divided into three groups according to the use of pacifiers. The prevalence of posterior crossbite at the age of 7 years was higher if a non-study pacifier had been used (P = .005) even when matched for the mother's level of education (P = .029). The prevalence of posterior crossbite was higher if the pacifier habit had continued for 12 months or more compared to 11 months or less, 7% and 1%, respectively, (P = .003). Digit sucking for 12 months or more was associated with crowding (P = .016). The prevalence of crossbite in the study pacifier group was less than in control pacifiers. Harms: No adverse harms were reported other than effects on the dentition. Conclusion: The use of pacifiers is associated with the posterior crossbite, especially if their use continues for a year or more. Parents/guardians should be advised to stop the use or reduce the use of pacifiers to a minimum after their child's first birthday. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01854502. (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu