Estimation of urinary volume through ultrasonography in dog cadavers and experimental models.

Autor: Rodrigues HLS; College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Brazil., Pimenta LEO; Resident of the Veterinary Imaging Diagnosis Program, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Brazil., Vasconcellos LMA; Resident of the Veterinary Imaging Diagnosis Program, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Brazil., Costa MM; College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Brazil., Crivellenti LZ; College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Brazil., Milken VMF; College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, Brazil.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association [Vet Radiol Ultrasound] 2024 Nov; Vol. 65 (6), pp. 713-721. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 07.
DOI: 10.1111/vru.13418
Abstrakt: The urinary volume and residual urine volume are pieces of information that can provide relevant clinical data for dogs and cats, especially those hospitalized. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate mathematical formulas described in human and veterinary literature to estimate urinary volume in dogs and experimental models. For this purpose, nine male dog cadavers and twelve experimental models were used to evaluate residual volume, small, medium, and large, using three different formulas. Data were obtained by three different examiners: two ultrasonographers and one nonultrasonographer. Each examiner recorded three longitudinal and transverse images, obtaining measurements of width, length, and height at each proposed volume. The measurements were then averaged, and the result was added to the formulas, thus estimating urinary volume. All three formulas achieved higher accuracy in estimating smaller volumes, with a gradual decrease as urinary volume increased. The error of all formulas was less than 10%, even when compared with evaluations in experimental models and dogs. There was variation in estimation between ultrasonographers and nonultrasonographer examiners; however, this variation was low, allowing for the assertion that both can apply the technique. Thus, it is concluded that estimating urinary bladder volume using mathematical formulas and 2D ultrasound is accurate and, therefore, an alternative and viable option for evaluating the urinary tract.
(© 2024 American College of Veterinary Radiology.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: