| Autor: |
Beckman CKC; Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde e Odontologia Infantil, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil., Luppieri V; Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy., Pereira LM; Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde e Odontologia Infantil, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil., Silva CR; Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil., Castelo PM; Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Ambientais, Químicas e Farmacêuticas, Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Diadema, SP, Brazil., Cadenaro M; University of Trieste, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Trieste, Italy., Rontani RMP; Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde e Odontologia Infantil, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil., Castilho ARF; Indiana University, School of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Bloomington, IU, USA. |
| Abstrakt: |
The study aimed to compare the adherence of Brazilian and Italian pediatric dentists to the biosafety measures and operative protocols recommended by the health authorities during COVID-19 pandemic and to classify the participants according to their risk of infection. An online questionnaire with 34 questions about sociodemographic and occupational data, dental practice organization, biological risk management, and clinical operative protocols was sent to Brazilian and Italian pediatric dentists using a convenience sampling strategy. Chi-square test and multivariate analysis (two-step cluster) were performed (α = 5%). Of 641 respondents (377 Brazilians and 264 Italians), most were female (94% and 70%, respectively), aged 20-39 years (63%), with over 10 years of professional experience (58% and 49%, respectively). Based on adherence to recommended biosafety measures, participants were classified as "safer" (n = 219) or "less safe" (n = 422). Adherence to recommended protocols by the majority of participants resulted in low contagion rates (Brazilians = 5%; Italians = 12.5%). Participants with extensive professional experience in the dental setting exhibited a greater tendency to implement multiple adaptations (three or more) in their practice. Most participants (Brazilians = 92%; Italians = 80.7%) adopted the recommended minimal intervention dentistry approaches, with the use of fissure sealants and the use of non-rotary instruments for caries removal the most frequently techniques used among Brazilians (36%) and Italians (66%), respectively. Two different profiles of pediatric dentists were identified based on the biosafety protocols adopted during the pandemic. In addition, changes were implemented in the dental care provided to children, with focus on the minimal intervention dentistry. |
