Use of morcellation in laparoscopic myomectomy. Medical malpractice and medicolegal considerations.

Autor:	Baldino G; Legal Medicine Section, Biomorf Department, Messina University, Messina, Italy., Iannello D; Legal Medicine Section, Biomorf Department, Messina University, Messina, Italy., Bartoloni G; Department of Anatomy, Diagnostic Pathology, Legal Medicine Hygiene and Public Health, Catania University, Catania, Italy., Burrascano G; Legal Medicine Section, Biomorf Department, Messina University, Messina, Italy., Asmundo A; Legal Medicine Section, Biomorf Department, Messina University, Messina, Italy., Ventura Spagnolo E; Legal Medicine Section, Biomorf Department, Messina University, Messina, Italy.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	La Clinica terapeutica [Clin Ter] 2024 Jul-Aug; Vol. 175 (Suppl 2(4)), pp. 130-133.
DOI:	10.7417/CT.2024.5100
Abstrakt:	Background: In recent years, due to the increase in medical mal-practice complaints, the Sicilian Regional Health System has adopted procedures for the direct management of claims by each health facility with the aim of reducing the costs of insurance premiums and related taxes. Mandatory sentinel event monitoring is a crucial part of this strategy to improve patient safety and quality of care. The reported case relates to a laparoscopic myomectomy surgery performed by means of morcellation, a controversial technique. After the FDA's intervention in 2014, it is believed that morcellation may worsen the staging of the disease by spreading malignancies such as leiomyosarcoma into the abdomen. Case Report: A 28-year-old woman, underwent laparoscopic surgery for uterine fibroids and an ovarian cyst removal in August 2018. Post-surgery, she was diagnosed with Leiomyoma. She returned to the hospital due to metrorrhagia and was discharged after a week. Persistent symptoms led to her readmission and subsequent exploratory laparoscopic surgery at another hospital. This resulted in a total hysterectomy and the discovery of uterine leiomyosarcoma, with FIGO STAGE IIIB staging. Despite chemotherapy, she passed away six months later. Discussion and Conclusions: This case highlights medical-legal issues. Informed consent for morcellation and its risks was not obtained. The morcellation technique was used, increasing cancer spread risk. The histopathological process was inadequate, with three biopsies leading to misdiagnosis. This could be medical malpractice, making providers legally responsible for the patient's deteriorating condition and the anticipation of possible death.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu