Ex Vivo Porcine Model for Ureteral Stent Placement Training.

Autor:	Borrego M; Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Electronic address: borregom1@uthscsa.edu., Ortiz CB; Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas., Kroma A; Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas., Walker J; Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas., Lopera J; Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR [J Vasc Interv Radiol] 2024 Nov; Vol. 35 (11), pp. 1714-1718.e2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 02.
DOI:	10.1016/j.jvir.2024.07.025
Abstrakt:	Realistic simulation models for interventional radiology procedures are limited, including for placement of double-J ureteral stents (DJSs). Using a porcine kidney and empty saline bag (bladder), an ex vivo model aiming to improve operators' knowledge and confidence in performing a DJS procedure was developed. Six faculty (J.W., J.L.) and 14 trainees (C.B.O.) successfully operated on the model. Mean results for faculty versus trainees were as follows: 2.2 (SD ± 1.5) versus 2.4 (SD ± 1.5) puncture attempts to access the collecting system (P = .78), 14.5 minutes (SD ± 4.8) versus 15.1 minutes (SD ± 6.0) for insertion time (P = .84), 7.3 minutes (SD ± 2.8) versus 10.3 minutes (SD ± 2.6) for exchange time (P = .04), 8.48 minutes (SD ± 2.0) versus 8.01 minutes (SD ± 2.6) for fluoroscopy time (P = .70), and 5.7 mGy (SD ± 1.6) versus 5.4 mGy (SD ± 2.0) for absorbed air kerma (P = .77). Self-assessed knowledge and confidence with DJS placement increased for all participants following model use. (Published by Elsevier Inc.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu