Participant factors associated with psychosocial impacts of lung cancer screening: A systematic review.

Autor: McFadden K; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia., Nickel B; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia., Rankin NM; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia., Li T; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia., Jennett CJ; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia., Sharman A; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia., Quaife SL; Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK., Houssami N; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia., Dodd RH; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Cancer medicine [Cancer Med] 2024 Aug; Vol. 13 (15), pp. e70054.
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70054
Abstrakt: Background: Psychosocial impacts of lung cancer screening (LCS) can cause both harm to individuals and serve as barriers to screening participation and adherence. Early data suggest that the psychosocial impacts of LCS are moderated by certain factors (e.g. sociodemographic characteristics and beliefs), but evidence synthesis is lacking. This systematic review aimed to understand individual-level risk factors for psychosocial burden during LCS as a precursor to developing strategies to identify and support participants, and improve LCS engagement.
Methods: Four databases were searched for full-text articles published in English reporting any association between participant factors and psychosocial outcomes experienced during LCS. Study quality was assessed by two independent investigators; findings were synthesised narratively. The review was pre-registered with PROSPERO and adhered to PRISMA guidelines.
Results: Thirty-five articles were included; most (33/35) studies were assessed at high or moderate risk of bias. Study designs were pre-post (n = 13), cross-sectional (n = 13), qualitative (n = 8) and mixed-methods (n = 1) and conducted primarily in the United States (n = 17). Psychological burden in LCS varied, and was often associated with younger age, female gender, current smoking status or increased smoking history, lower education, lower socio-economic group, not being married or co-habiting and experience with cancer. However, results were mixed, and non-significant associations were also reported across all factors. Beliefs (e.g. fatalism, stigma and expectation of LDCT results) and comorbid psychological burden were also linked to psychosocial outcomes, but evidence was sparse. Associations between risk perception, other participant factors and other psychosocial outcomes was inconclusive, likely reflecting individual biases in risk conceptualisation.
Conclusion(s): Several participant factors are consistently reported to be associated with psychosocial impacts of LCS, though study heterogeneity and high risk of bias necessitate more robust evaluation. Further research on how perceptions, beliefs and expectations can be used to improve psychosocial outcomes during LCS is needed.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje