Interdisciplinary Delphi study by PROSEC North America: Recommendations on single indirect restorations made from ceramic and nonmetallic biomaterials for posterior teeth.

Autor: Eggmann F; Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, Robert Schattner Center, Penn Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.; Department of Periodontology, Endodontology, and Cariology, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland., Orta AL; Department of Advanced Oral Sciences and Therapeutics, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.; Department of Restorative Sciences, Advanced Education in Prosthodontics, The Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA., Abdulmajeed A; Department of General Practice and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA., Att W; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany., Beuer F; Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany., Bergler M; Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, Robert Schattner Center, Penn Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA., Blatz MB; Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, Robert Schattner Center, Penn Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA., Brief J; PROSEC gGmbH, Bad Säckingen, Germany.; VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany., Castro VE; Studio-280, Houston, Texas, USA., Cooper LF; School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA., Han S; Master's Arch, Phoenix, Arizona, USA., Ortiz MA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Illinois College of Dentistry, Chicago, Illinois, USA., Paravina RD; Department of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, John M. Powers, PhD, Center for Biomaterials and Biomimetics, The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA., Pizzi P; Pizzi Dental Studio, Staten Island, New York, USA., Tholey MJ; PROSEC gGmbH, Bad Säckingen, Germany.; VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany., Conejo J; Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, Robert Schattner Center, Penn Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] [J Esthet Restor Dent] 2024 Aug 02. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Aug 02.
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13289
Abstrakt: Objective: This article puts forward consensus recommendations from PROSEC North America regarding single indirect restorations made from ceramic and nonmetallic biomaterials in posterior teeth.
Overview: The consensus process involved a multidisciplinary panel and three consensus workshops. A systematic literature review was conducted across five databases to gather evidence. The recommendations, informed by findings from systematic reviews and formulated based on a two-phase e-Delphi survey, emphasize a comprehensive treatment strategy that includes noninvasive measures alongside restorative interventions for managing dental caries and tooth wear. The recommendations advocate for selecting between direct and indirect restorations on a case-by-case basis, favoring inlays and onlays over crowns to align with minimally invasive dentistry principles. The recommendations highlight the critical role of selecting restorative biomaterials based on clinical performance, esthetic properties, and adherence to manufacturer guidelines. They emphasize the importance of precision in restorative procedures, including tooth preparation, impression taking, contamination control, and luting. Regular follow-up and maintenance tailored to individual patient needs are crucial for the longevity of ceramic and nonmetallic restorations.
Conclusions: These PROSEC recommendations provide a framework for dental practitioners to deliver high-quality restorative care, advocating for personalized treatment planning and minimally invasive approaches to optimize oral health outcomes.
Clinical Significance: The PROSEC North America recommendations highlight the importance of minimally invasive techniques in posterior tooth restorations using ceramic and non-metallic biomaterials. These principles prioritize tooth structure conservation and personalized treatment planning, essential for enhancing clinical outcomes and long-term oral health.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: