Ultrasound-Guided Versus Palpation-Guided Techniques to Achieve Vascular Access in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Autor: | Ibrahim AA; Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt. Ahmedabdalaziz33@med.menofia.edu.eg., Allam AR; Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt., Amin AM; Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt., Rakab MS; Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt., Alhadeethi A; Department of General Medicine, Al-Salam Teaching Hospital, Ninevah, Iraq., Hageen AW; Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt., Mahmoud A; Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt., Abuelazm M; Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt., Abdelazeem B; Department of Cardiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Pediatric cardiology [Pediatr Cardiol] 2024 Jul 27. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 27. |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00246-024-03581-y |
Abstrakt: | Pediatric heart surgery is a vital therapeutic option for congenital heart disease, which is one of the most prevalent causes of death in children. Arterial cannulation (AC) and central venous catheter (CVC) are required in pediatric cardiac surgery for continuous monitoring of the central venous pressure (CVP), replacement of fluid or blood products, close hemodynamic monitoring, and frequent sampling for arterial blood gases (ABG). A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until February 2024. Risk ratio (RR) was used to report dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) was used to report continuous outcomes, both with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. Thirteen RCTs with 1060 children were included. Regarding arterial cannulation, the ultrasound-guided technique (US) was associated with a statistically significant increase in successful cannulation [RR: 1.31 with 95% CI (1.10, 1.56), P < 0.0001], and first-attempt success [RR: 1.88 with 95% CI (1.35, 2.63), P < 0.0001]. However, US was not associated with any statistically significant difference in venous cannulation in both outcomes with [RR: 1.13 with 95% CI (0.98, 1.30), P = 0.10], [RR: 1.53 with 95% CI (0.86, 2.71), P = 0.15] respectively. Moreover, US was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the number of attempts either in arterial cannulation with [MD: - 0.73 with 95% CI (- 1.00, - 0.46), P < 0.0001] or in venous cannulation with [MD: - 1.34 with 95% CI (- 2.55, - 0.12), P = 0.03], and the time of attempted cannulation also either in arterial cannulation with [MD: - 2.27 with 95% CI (- 3.38, - 1.16), P < 0.0001] or in venous cannulation with [MD: - 4.13 with 95% CI (- 7.06, - 1.19), P < 0.0001]. US guidance improves successful cannulation rates and first-attempt success in arterial access and reduces the number of attempts and procedural time for arterial and venous access. It was also associated with a lower incidence of complications and procedure failure, particularly in arterial access. However, it was associated with a higher incidence of venous puncture. (© 2024. The Author(s).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |