Response to discussant comments on "NMA, the first 20 years".

Autor: Ades AE; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK., Welton NJ; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK., Dias S; Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK., Caldwell DM; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK., Phillippo DM; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Research synthesis methods [Res Synth Methods] 2024 Jul 26. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 26.
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1745
Abstrakt: We respond to discussant comments on our paper "Twenty years of network meta-analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments" (https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1700) and raise some additional points for consideration, including: the way in which methodological guidance is generated; integration of the estimand framework with evidence synthesis; and implications of the European Joint Clinical Assessment. We ask: what properties are required of population adjustment methods to enable transparent and consistent decision-making? We also ask why individual patient data is not routinely made available to re-imbursement authorities and clinical guideline developers.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: