Coaxial plastic stent placement within lumen-apposing metal stents for the management of pancreatic fluid collections: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Autor: AbiMansour J; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Jaruvongvanich V; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Velaga S; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Law R; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Storm AC; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Topazian M; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Levy MJ; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Alexander R; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Vargas EJ; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Bofill-Garica A; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Martin JA; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Petersen BT; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Abu Dayyeh BK; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA., Chandrasekhara V; Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Clinical endoscopy [Clin Endosc] 2024 Sep; Vol. 57 (5), pp. 595-603. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 24.
DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.297
Abstrakt: Background/aims: Coaxial placement of double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) through lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) is commonly performed to reduce the risk of LAMS obstruction, bleeding, and stent migration when used for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the outcomes of LAMS alone and LAMS with coaxial DPPS placement in the management of PFCs.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies comparing LAMS and LAMS/DPPS for PFC drainage. Primary outcomes included the rate of clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), bleeding, infection, occlusion, and stent migration. The pooled effect size was summarized using a random-effects model and compared between LAMS and LAMS/DPPS by calculating odds ratios (ORs).
Results: Nine studies involving 709 patients were identified (338 on LAMS and 371 on LAMS/DPPS). LAMS/DPPS was associated with a reduced risk of stent obstruction (OR, 0.59; p=0.004) and infection (OR, 0.55; p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in clinical success (OR, 0.96; p=0.440), overall AEs (OR, 0.57; p=0.060), bleeding (OR, 0.61; p=0.120), or stent migration (OR, 1.03; p=0.480).
Conclusions: Coaxial DPPS for LAMS drainage of PFCs is associated with a reduced risk of stent occlusion and infection; however, no difference was observed in the overall AE rates or bleeding.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: