Associations Between Drug Overdose Mortality and Recovery Ecosystems in the United States: A County-Level Analysis Using a Novel Index.

Autor:	Wahlquist AE; Center for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA., Mathis SM; Center for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA., Hunt Trull L; Center for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA., Toitole KK; Center for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA., Howard A; Fletcher Group, Inc., London, KY, USA., Fletcher E; Fletcher Group, Inc., London, KY, USA., Meit M; Center for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Substance use & addiction journal [Subst Use Addctn J] 2024 Jul 23, pp. 29767342241262125. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 23.
DOI:	10.1177/29767342241262125
Abstrakt:	Background: Communities with robust recovery ecosystems could reduce negative outcomes associated with substance use disorders (SUDs) and facilitate the recovery process. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between drug overdose mortality rates in the United States and the strength of county-level recovery ecosystems, as measured by the Recovery Ecosystem Index (REI). Methods: The REI assesses the strength of county-level recovery ecosystems in the United States. Comprised of 14 indicators across 3 component classes, overall and component scores ranging from "one" (strongest) to "five" (weakest) were calculated for each county using standardized values of the indicators. County-level analyses included: (1) correlational analyses between drug overdose mortality rates (n = 2076) and REI scores (overall score and by component); and (2) quadrant analysis (n = 2076), dividing counties based on their drug overdose mortality rates and overall REI scores. Results: Drug overdose mortality rates were inversely related to REI overall, SUD treatment component, and continuum of SUD support component scores, indicating that lower (stronger) scores corresponded to higher rates. Conversely, REI infrastructure and social component scores were positively related to rates. Counties were relatively evenly distributed across quadrants, with 26% (n = 537) with a strong REI score and high overdose mortality rate, 24% (n = 489) with a strong REI score and low overdose mortality rate, 20% (n = 409) with a weak REI and high overdose mortality rate, and 31% (n = 641) with a weak REI and low overdose mortality rate. Conclusions: REI scores were generally inversely associated with drug overdose mortality rates in US counties, suggesting that communities have stronger recovery systems and services as the burden of SUD increases. Given relative variation in the scale of drug overdose mortality and strength of recovery ecosystems among counties, results could guide the identification of communities where the need for expanded recovery systems and services may be particularly critical. Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu