Infectious Complications Following CD30 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Adults.
Autor: | Cao F, Xiu Y, Mohnasky M, Serody JS, Armistead P, Dotti G, Smith M, Huggins J, Messina J, Ramachandran B, Saullo J, Stromberg J, Saha MK, Walsh M, Savoldo B, Grover N, Henderson HI, Andermann TM |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | MedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences [medRxiv] 2024 Jul 11. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 11. |
DOI: | 10.1101/2024.07.10.24310235 |
Abstrakt: | Infections are increasingly recognized as a common complication of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. The incidence of clinically-defined infection after CD19.CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory lymphoma ranges from 60-90% in the first year after CAR T-cell therapy and is the most common cause for non-relapse mortality. However, infectious risk after CAR T-cell therapy targeting other malignancies is not well understood. Herein, we report for the first time, infectious complications after CD30.CAR T-cell treatment for patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Since CD30 is only expressed on a subset of activated T and B-cells, we hypothesized that CD30.CAR T-cell patients would have reduced incidence and severity of infections after infusion compared to CD19.CAR T-cell patients. We retrospectively evaluated all 64 patients who received CD30.CAR T-cells at a single institution between 2016-2021, and assessed infections within one year after cell infusion, comparing these data to a contemporary cohort of 50 patients who received CD19.CAR T-cells at the same institution between 2018-2021. 23 CD30.CAR T-cell patients (36%) and 18 CD19.CAR T-cell patients (36%) developed a microbiologically confirmed infection. Infection severity and bacterial infections were higher in the CD19.CAR T-cell group compared to CD30.CAR T-cell recipients who more commonly had grade 1 respiratory viral infections. Our data reflect expected outcomes for severity and infection type in CD19.CAR T-cell patients and provide a benchmark for comparison with the novel CD30.CAR T-cell product. Although our findings require replication in a larger cohort, they have implications for antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines after CD30.CAR T-cell therapy. Key Points: 1) The incidence of infections within the first year after CD30.CAR T-cell therapy was equivalent to that following CD19.CAR T-cell therapy2) Viral infections were more common after CD30.CAR T-cell therapy but bacterial infections predominated after CD19.CAR T-cell therapy. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |