Hybrid approaches to allied health services for children and young people: a scoping review.

Autor: Krasovsky T; Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, 199 Abba Hushi Avenue, Haifa, 3498838, Israel. tkrasovsk@univ.haifa.ac.il.; Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, The Edmond & Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. tkrasovsk@univ.haifa.ac.il., Weiss PL; Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.; The Helmsley Pediatric & Adolescent Rehabilitation Research Center, ALYN Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel., Gafni-Lachter L; Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.; College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Occupational Therapy, Sargent College, Boston University, Boston, USA., Kizony R; Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.; Department of Occupational Therapy, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel., Gefen N; The Helmsley Pediatric & Adolescent Rehabilitation Research Center, ALYN Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.; School of Occupational Therapy, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.; ALYN Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation [J Neuroeng Rehabil] 2024 Jul 19; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 122. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 19.
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01401-1
Abstrakt: Background: Hybrid models that integrate both in-person and remote health services are increasingly recognized as a promising approach. Nevertheless, research that defines and characterizes these models in children and young people is scarce and essential for establishing guidelines for implementation of hybrid allied health services. This scoping review evaluates four key aspects of hybrid allied health services in children and young people: 1. definitions, 2. service characteristics, 3. outcome measures, and 4. results of hybrid allied health services.
Methods: Six databases were searched: Medline (Ovid), Embase, CINHAL, Psycinfo, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Of the 9,868 studies potentially meeting the inclusion criteria, 49 studies focused on children and young people. Following full-text review, n = 21 studies were included.
Results: Terminology used for hybrid allied health services varied across studies which targeted diverse clinical populations and varied in study design, type and frequency of remote and in-person treatments. Over 75% of cases used custom-written software, limiting scalability. All interventions started in-person, possibly to establish a therapeutic alliance and solve technological issues. Most hybrid allied health services (67%) were in mental health, while only a minority involved physical, occupational or speech therapy. The most common outcomes were feasibility and satisfaction, but tools used to measure them were inconsistent. Although 57% of studies demonstrated effectiveness of hybrid allied health services, none measured cost-effectiveness.
Discussion: Despite the potential of hybrid allied health services for children and young people, the literature remains at a preliminary stage. Standardization of definitions and outcome measures, and clearer reporting of service characteristics and results would likely promote consolidation of hybrid allied health services in children and young people into clinical practice.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje