"Let's Chat!" Improving Emergency Department Staff Satisfaction with the Medication Reconciliation Process.

Autor: Schwieters K; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.; Idaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, Meridian, Idaho., Voigt R; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota., McDonald S; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota., Scanlan-Hanson L; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota., Norman B; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota., Larson E; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.; Mayo Clinic, Department of Nursing, Rochester, Minnesota., Garcia A; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota., Madsen B; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota., Rudis M; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.; Mayo Clinic, Department of Pharmacy, Rochester, Minnesota., Bellolio F; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota., Hevesi S; Mayo Clinic, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: The western journal of emergency medicine [West J Emerg Med] 2024 Jul; Vol. 25 (4), pp. 624-633.
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.18324
Abstrakt: Introduction: Patients who stay in the emergency department (ED) for prolonged periods of time require verification of home medications, a process known as medication reconciliation. The complex nature of medication reconciliation can lead to adverse events and staff dissatisfaction. A multidisciplinary team was formed to improve accuracy, timing, and staff satisfaction with the medication reconciliation process.
Methods: Between November 2021-January 2022, stakeholders were surveyed to identify gaps in the medication reconciliation process. This project implemented education on role-specific tasks, as well as a "Let's chat!" huddle, bringing together the entire care team to perform medication reconciliation. We used real-time evaluations by frontline staff to evaluate effectiveness during plan- do-study-act cycles and obtain feedback. Following the implementation period, stakeholders completed the post-intervention survey between June-July 2022, using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = very dissatisfied to 3 = very satisfied). We calculated the change in staff satisfaction from pre-intervention to post-intervention. Differences in proportions and 95% confidence intervals are reported. This study adhered to the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) and followed the Lean Six Sigma rapid cycle process improvement (define-measure-analyze-improve-control).
Results: A total of 111 front-line ED staff (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, nurses) completed the pre-intervention survey (of 350 ED staff, corresponding to a 31.7% response rate), and 89 stakeholders completed the post-intervention survey (a 25.4% response rate). Subjective feedback from staff identifying causes of low satisfaction with the initial process included the following: complexity of process; unclear delineation of staff roles; time burden to completion; high patient volume; and lack of standardized communication of task completion. Overall satisfaction improved after the intervention. The greatest improvement was seen in the correct medication (difference 20.7%, confidence interval [CI] 6.3-33.9%, P  < 0.01), correct dose (25.6%, CI 11.4-38.6%, P  < 0.001) and time last taken (24.5%, CI 11.4-37.0%, P  < 0.001).
Conclusion: There is a steep learning curve to educate multidisciplinary staff on a new process and implement the associated changes. With goals to impact the safety of our patients and reduce negative outcomes, engagement and awareness of the team involved in the medication reconciliation process is critical to improve staff satisfaction.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: By the WestJEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: