The relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and audiometric thresholds in the extended high-frequency range.
Autor: | Hauser SN; Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47901, USA., Hustedt-Mai AR; Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47901, USA., Wichlinski A; Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47901, USA., Bharadwaj HM; Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | BioRxiv : the preprint server for biology [bioRxiv] 2024 Jul 10. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 10. |
DOI: | 10.1101/2024.07.05.601801 |
Abstrakt: | Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and behavioral audiometry are routinely used for hearing screening and assessment. These measures provide related information about hearing status as both are sensitive to cochlear pathologies. However, DPOAE testing is quicker and does not require a behavioral response. Despite these practical advantages, DPOAE testing is often limited to screening only low and mid- frequencies. Variation in ear canal acoustics across ears and probe placements has resulted in less reliable measurements of DPOAEs near 4 kHz and above where standing waves commonly occur. Stimulus calibration in forward pressure level and responses in emitted pressure level can reduce measurement variability. Using these calibrations, this study assessed the correlation between audiometry and DPOAEs in the extended high frequencies where stimulus calibrations and responses are most susceptible to the effect of standing waves. Behavioral thresholds and DPOAE amplitudes were negatively correlated, and DPOAE amplitudes in emitted pressure level accounted for twice as much variance as amplitudes in sound pressure level. Both measures were correlated with age. These data show that with appropriate calibration methods, extended high-frequency DPOAEs are sensitive to differences in audiometric thresholds and highlight the need to consider calibration techniques in clinical and research applications of DPOAEs. Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflicts to disclose. |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |