How the manner in which data is visualized affects and corrects (mis)perceptions of political polarization.
Autor: | Tartaglione J; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK., de-Wit L; University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | The British journal of social psychology [Br J Soc Psychol] 2025 Jan; Vol. 64 (1), pp. e12787. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 17. |
DOI: | 10.1111/bjso.12787 |
Abstrakt: | While the mechanisms underlying polarization are complex, scholars have consistently found a pervasive overestimation of perceptions of polarization to be a contributing factor. We argue that one mitigation strategy that can work at scale to address such misperceptions might be relatively straightforward: better data visualizations of cross-party attitudes on key issues. In a large-scale (N = 6603), international replication, we find that mode of presentation-or the manner in which data are visually presented-plays a significant role in moderating perceptions of polarization, even for longstanding, divisive issues for which partisans would likely hold strong prior beliefs. Additionally, we find the effects that different modes of presentation have on issue-specific polarization also extend to participant beliefs about overall interparty polarization, with certain modes proving capable of not only promoting less polarized views but also enabling more accurate estimates of the extent to which political groups agree. Finally, our findings also suggest that the manner in which intergroup data are visualized may also exert influence over the degree to which political groups are essentialized-a finding with implications for not only political perception but also for apolitical social psychological phenomena such as dehumanization. (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |