Patient adherence in orthodontics: a scoping review.
Autor: | van der Bie RM; Department of Orthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam (UvA) and Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.m.vander.bie@acta.nl., Bos A; Department of Orthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam (UvA) and Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Bruers JJM; Department of Oral Public Health, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam (UvA) and Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, The Netherlands., Jonkman REG; Department of Orthodontics, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam (UvA) and Vrije Universiteit (VU), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | BDJ open [BDJ Open] 2024 Jul 16; Vol. 10 (1), pp. 58. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 16. |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41405-024-00235-2 |
Abstrakt: | Background: Patient adherence is a key factor in achieving orthodontic treatment success. Despite an evolution in orthodontic healthcare, no recent comprehensive reviews are available on patient adherence in orthodontics. This scoping review provides an evidence-based overview of the literature available on multiple aspects of patient adherence in orthodontics, during both active treatment as well as during the retention phase. Knowledge gaps identified in the literature are listed. Methods: The protocol for this scoping review was registered in the Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/EC6QD ). Electronic databases and reference lists of relevant studies were searched up to 9 February 2023. The inclusion criteria were studies investigating any form of patient adherence in orthodontics published in English from 2006 onwards. The exclusion criteria were studies investigating adherence in the following patients: those with an intellectual or physical disability that could affect their ability to coincide with their therapist's recommendations and advice, those with oral cleft and craniofacial conditions, and those treated solely for obstructive sleep apnoea. Non-peer-reviewed studies and case reports were also excluded. Results: A total of 3284 articles were identified, 60 of which met the criteria for final inclusion. Conclusions: There is no conclusive evidence on which factors have a significant impact on patient adherence and how patient adherence can be promoted. The degree of patient adherence is generally not compared to achieved treatment results or stability of treatment results, making it difficult to provide clear statements about the impact of the degree of adherence on desired treatment results or orthodontic stability. (© 2024. The Author(s).) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |