Do Measures of Real-World Physical Behavior Provide Insights Into the Well-Being and Physical Function of Cancer Survivors? Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Autor: | Bachman SL; VivoSense, Inc, Newport Coast, CA, United States., Gomes E; Department of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States., Aryal S; VivoSense, Inc, Newport Coast, CA, United States., Cella D; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States., Clay I; VivoSense, Inc, Newport Coast, CA, United States., Lyden K; VivoSense, Inc, Newport Coast, CA, United States., Leach HJ; Department of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | JMIR cancer [JMIR Cancer] 2024 Jul 15; Vol. 10, pp. e53180. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 15. |
DOI: | 10.2196/53180 |
Abstrakt: | Background: As the number of cancer survivors increases, maintaining health-related quality of life in cancer survivorship is a priority. This necessitates accurate and reliable methods to assess how cancer survivors are feeling and functioning. Real-world digital measures derived from wearable sensors offer potential for monitoring well-being and physical function in cancer survivorship, but questions surrounding the clinical utility of these measures remain to be answered. Objective: In this secondary analysis, we used 2 existing data sets to examine how measures of real-world physical behavior, captured with a wearable accelerometer, were related to aerobic fitness and self-reported well-being and physical function in a sample of individuals who had completed cancer treatment. Methods: Overall, 86 disease-free cancer survivors aged 21-85 years completed self-report assessments of well-being and physical function, as well as a submaximal exercise test that was used to estimate their aerobic fitness, quantified as predicted submaximal oxygen uptake (VO Results: Spearman correlation analyses indicated that 6 (86%) of the 7 accelerometry-derived measures of real-world physical behavior were not significantly correlated with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General total well-being or linked Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function scores (Ps≥.08). In contrast, all but one of the physical behavior measures were significantly correlated with submaximal VO Conclusions: In a sample of disease-free cancer survivors, we found that several measures of real-world physical behavior were more associated with aerobic fitness than with self-reported well-being and physical function. These results highlight the possibility that in individuals who have completed cancer treatment, measures of real-world physical behavior may provide additional information compared with self-reported and performance measures. To advance the appropriate use of digital measures in oncology clinical research, further research evaluating the clinical utility of real-world physical behavior over time in large, representative samples of cancer survivors is warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03781154; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03781154. (©Shelby L Bachman, Emma Gomes, Suvekshya Aryal, David Cella, Ieuan Clay, Kate Lyden, Heather J Leach. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 15.07.2024.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |