Impact of acid and laser etching of enamel on microleakage in different adhesive systems.

Autor: Atilan Yavuz S; Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Mersin University, Mersin, Türkiye. dtsevimatilan@gmail.com., Erturk Avunduk AT; Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Mersin University, Mersin, Türkiye., Karatas O; Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, Kayseri, Türkiye., Çakır Kılınç NN; Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, Kayseri, Türkiye., Delikan E; Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, Kayseri, Türkiye.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Lasers in medical science [Lasers Med Sci] 2024 Jul 15; Vol. 39 (1), pp. 181. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 15.
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-024-04120-0
Abstrakt: This study aimed to evaluate the microleakage of light-cured and self-cured adhesives on enamel surfaces selectively etched with Er, Cr: YSGG laser or 35% phosphoric acid. A total of 60 class V cavities were prepared 1 mm above the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). The specimens were randomly divided into six groups. Group 1: Clearfil SE Bond with no conditioning, Group 2: Tokuyama Universal Bond with no conditioning, Group 3: Clearfil SE Bond conditioned with 35% phosphoric acid, Group 4: Tokuyama Universal Bond conditioned with 35% phosphoric acid, Group 5: Clearfil SE Bond conditioned with Er, Cr: YSGG laser and Group 6: Tokuyama Universal Bond conditioned with Er, Cr: YSGG laser. Microleakage was evaluated qualitatively (visually) and quantitatively (ImageJ). The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS V23 and submitted to Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. In all evaluation methods, the microleakage scores exhibit significant differences (p*<0.001). Group 1 and Group 3 exhibited similar and lower microleakage values than the Group 5. In the occlusal margin, the microleakage values were similar in Group 2, Group 4, and Group 6, whereas in the gingival margin Group 4 showed significantly lower leakage compared to Group 2. Regardless of the etching protocols and adhesive systems used, less microleakage was observed on the occlusal surface than on the gingival surface. Phosphoric acid etching provides better results than laser etching for enamel surface treatment on both occlusal and gingival surfaces.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: