Who, What, Where, and How? The State of Family Science in Pediatric Palliative Care.

Autor: Broden EG; Yale National Clinician Scholars Program (E.G.B.), Yale University, New Haven, CT; School of Public Health (E.G.B.), Yale University, New Haven, CT. Electronic address: elizabeth.broden@yale.edu., Boyden JY; Department of Family and Community Health (J.Y.B.), School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Division of General Pediatrics (J.Y.B.), Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA., Keller S; Research Library (S.K.M.), Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC., James R; Nemours Children's Health (R.J.M.), Wilmington, DE; Fontan Outcomes Network., Mooney-Doyle K; Department of Family and Community Health (K.M-D.), School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of pain and symptom management [J Pain Symptom Manage] 2024 Oct; Vol. 68 (4), pp. e254-e279. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 09.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.06.022
Abstrakt: Context: Families are vital providers and recipients of pediatric palliative care (PPC) services. Understanding the scope and nature of evidence at the intersection of family science and PPC research is necessary to develop family-focused interventions that enhance child and family health.
Objectives: Explore and describe the family-level impact of pediatric serious illness.
Methods: We conducted a librarian-assisted scoping review using Arskey and O'Malley's approach. We searched PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for empirical publications from 2016 to 2021 that focused on families navigating serious pediatric illness published in English. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, with discrepancies resolved by a third. We used Covidence and REDCap for data management and extraction.
Results: We screened 10,983 abstracts; 309 abstracts were included in full text screening. The final group of 52 citations was analyzed by the entire team. Most research was conducted in Western Europe and North America. The perspectives of parents of children with cancer were most frequently described; voices of seriously ill youth and their siblings were less often presented. Most of the research was descriptive qualitative, followed by descriptive quantitative. Few studies were mixed methods, inferential, or interpretive. Studies most often described parent, youth, and family experience with illness and less often explored family processes and relationships. Irrespective of the approach (i.e., qualitative, quantitative), few studies focused on families as the analytic unit or used family-level analysis techniques. Study participants were usually from local dominant populations and less often from historically marginalized communities.
Conclusion: The robust, descriptive, and individual-level evidence describing family impact of serious pediatric illness provides a solid foundation for future research priorities. Stronger integration of family techniques and diverse family voices in pediatric palliative care research can clarify family processes, illuminate structural barriers, and inform interventions that are responsive to family needs. These steps will enhance the education, policy, and clinical provision of PPC to all who would benefit, thereby advancing health equity for children living with serious illness and their families.
(Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: