Optimizing Root Canal Therapy: An In Vitro Comparative Study of Innovative File Systems on Mandibular Premolar Fracture Resistance.
| Autor: | P S; Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, IND., M JNK; Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, IND., Reddy J; Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, IND., N NK; Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, IND., Jayyarapu D; Prosthodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, IND., Punna R; Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, IND., R D; Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, IND., S A; Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, IND. |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Zdroj: | Cureus [Cureus] 2024 Jun 10; Vol. 16 (6), pp. e62077. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 10 (Print Publication: 2024). |
| DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.62077 |
| Abstrakt: | Introduction and Aim: Root canal therapy is a vital procedure for saving teeth by removing infection and cleaning the complex root canal system. However, a delicate balance exists between thorough cleaning and preserving tooth strength. The study aims to evaluate the instrumentation effect of three innovative file systems, XP-endo® shaper, Reciproc®, and Self-adjusting file (SAF) on fracture resistance of mandibular premolars. Materials and Methods: Thirty single-rooted mandibular premolars were collected; a standard access cavity was prepared and the working length was established 1 mm short of the apex. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups(n=10). In Group 1, the shaping of the specimens was achieved using XP-endo® shaper; in Group 2, it was instrumented using Reciproc® file; and in Group 3, it was instrumented using SAF. All samples were decoronated and the roots were mounted vertically in acrylic resin and subjected to fracture resistance under a universal testing machine. Results: Intergroup analysis was done by one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, which did not report a statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion: All three tested file systems were similar in fracture resistance. XP-endo® shaper exhibited better fracture resistance on root canal instrumentation when compared to Reciproc® and SAF although they are not statistically significant. Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee at Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda issued approval KIDS/IEC/2024/401. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. (Copyright © 2024, P et al.) |
| Databáze: | MEDLINE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|