An Approach to Selection of Face-Lift Techniques for Different Types of Faces: An Analysis of 1000 Asian Patients Over 9 Years.

Autor:	Kim DG; From the Plastic Surgery Department, BL Plastic Surgery Clinic, Daegu, Korea., Lee SH, Bae SG
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Annals of plastic surgery [Ann Plast Surg] 2024 Aug 01; Vol. 93 (2), pp. 153-162. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 10.
DOI:	10.1097/SAP.0000000000003982
Abstrakt:	Background: A face-lift or rhytidectomy is the procedure most directly associated with rejuvenation. There are several surgical techniques for face-lifts, but criteria for the selection of techniques, based on the patient's face shape, are lacking. In this study, we report on our experience with specific indication criteria for each technique and the consequent achievement of good outcomes. Methods: From 2015 to 2023, 1 surgeon performed face-lifts on 1000 patients. Three different superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) techniques (SMAS dissection, SMASectomy, and SMAS plication) were applied depending on the degree of sagging of the patient's lower face, lateral facial profile, and SMAS mobility and condition. Superficial musculoaponeurotic system dissection was considered for the improvement of a square face, sagging jowls, and marionette lines. Superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication was applied with patients with less sagging jowls and prominent zygoma with concave lateral facial profile. SMASectomy was applied with patients with convex lateral facial profiles or when the SMAS was too thin or damaged. Patient postoperative satisfaction was surveyed using the FACE-Q score 1 year post surgery. Results: Most of the patients attained natural-looking and long-lasting aesthetic outcomes and exhibited high satisfaction. The patients indicated that they looked about 11.2 ± 5.2 years younger than their actual age after the surgery. The mean satisfaction scores for each facial feature were as follows: cheeks (91.1 ± 7.8), marionette lines (88.5 ± 13.6), lower face and jawline (92.5 ± 14.2), under chin (87.8 ± 15.1), and neck (86.2 ± 18.5). Complications such as facial nerve injury, infection, hematoma, and flap necrosis were very rare. Conclusions: Establishing criteria for the selection of face-lift surgical techniques based on the degree of lower face sagging, lateral facial profile, and SMAS mobility and condition led to good outcomes. These criteria can be used by physicians to determine the most effective face-lift surgery technique based on a patient's individual features, which may improve surgical outcomes. Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared. (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu