Physiological and structural traits contribute to thermotolerance in wild Australian cotton species.
Autor: | Dubey G; Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia., Phillips AL; Department of Food Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia., Atwell BJ; School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Annals of botany [Ann Bot] 2024 Jul 09. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 09. |
DOI: | 10.1093/aob/mcae098 |
Abstrakt: | Background and Aims: Five species of cotton (Gossypium) were exposed to 38°C days during early vegetative development. Commercial cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) was contrasted with four wild cotton species (G. australe, G. bickii, G. robinsonii and G. sturtianum) that are endemic to central and northern Australia. Methods: Plants were grown at daytime maxima of 30°C or 38°C for 25 d, commencing at the four-leaf stage. Leaf areas and shoot biomass were used to calculate relative rates of growth and specific leaf areas. Leaf gas exchange measurements revealed assimilation and transpiration rates, as well as electron transport rates (ETR) and carboxylation efficiency (CE) in steady-state conditions. Finally, leaf morphological traits (mean leaf area and leaf shape were quantified), along with leaf surface decorations, imaged using scanning electron microscopy. Key Results: Shoot morphology was differentially affected by heat, with three of the four wild species growing faster at 38°C than at 30°C, whereas early growth in G. hirsutum was severely inhibited by heat. Areas of individual leaves and leaf numbers both contributed to these contrasting growth responses, with fewer, smaller leaves at 38°C in G. hirsutum. CO2 assimilation and transpiration rates of G. hirsutum were also dramatically reduced by heat. Cultivated cotton failed to achieve evaporative cooling, contrasting with the transpiration-driven cooling in the wild species. Heat substantially reduced ETR and CE in G. hirsutum, with much smaller effects in the wild species. We speculate that leaf shape, as assessed by invaginations of leaf margins, and leaf size contributed to heat dispersal differentially among the five species. Similarly, reflectance of light radiation was also highly distinctive for each species. Conclusions: These four wild Australian relatives of cotton have adapted to hot days that are inhibitory to commercial cotton, deploying a range of physiological and structural adaptations to achieve accelerated growth at 38°C. (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |