Evaluation of concordance of new QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus platforms for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection diagnosis in a prospective cohort of household contacts.

Autor:	Ruiz-Tagle C; Departamento de Enfermedades Infecciosas del Adulto, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile., García P; Departamento de Laboratorios Clínicos, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile., Hernández M; Equipo Técnico de Tuberculosis, Dirección de Servicio de Salud Oriente, Santiago, Chile., Balcells ME; Departamento de Enfermedades Infecciosas del Adulto, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.; Red de Salud UC-CHRISTUS, Santiago, Chile.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	Microbiology spectrum [Microbiol Spectr] 2024 Aug 06; Vol. 12 (8), pp. e0046924. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 08.
DOI:	10.1128/spectrum.00469-24
Abstrakt:	Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays play a pivotal role in tuberculosis infection (TBI) diagnosis, with QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus-an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-among the most widely utilized. Newer QuantiFERON-TB platforms with shorter turnaround times were recently released. We aimed to evaluate these platforms' agreement in the diagnosis of TBI. Blood samples from a prospective cohort of tuberculosis household contacts were collected at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow-up, and tested with LIAISON, an automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) system, QIAreach, a lateral flow (QFT-LF) semi-automated immunoassay, and the ELISA QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus platform. Test concordances were analyzed. ELISA vs CLIA overall agreement was 83.3% for all tested samples (120/144) [Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ): 0.66 (95% CI: 0.54-0.77)]. Samples positive with CLIA provided consistently higher IFN-γ levels than with ELISA ( P < 0.001). Twenty-four (16.7%) discordant pairs were obtained, all CLIA-positive/ELISA-negative: 15 (62.5%) had CLIA IFN-γ levels within borderline values (0.35-0.99 IU/mL) and 9 (37.5%) >0.99 IU/mL. QFT-LF showed only 76.4% (68/89) overall agreement with ELISA [κ: 0.53 (95% CI: 0.37-0.68)] with 21 (23.6%) discordant results obtained, all QFT-LF-positive/ELISA-negative. Overall concordance between ELISA and CLIA platforms was substantial, and only moderate between ELISA and QFT-LF. The CLIA platform yielded higher IFN-γ levels than ELISA, leading to an almost 17% higher positivity rate. The techniques do not seem interchangeable, and validation against other gold standards, such as microbiologically-confirmed tuberculosis disease, is required to determine whether these cases represent true new infections or whether CLIA necessitates a higher cutoff. Importance: Tuberculosis is an airborne infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis that affects over 10 million people annually, with over 2 billion people carrying an asymptomatic tuberculosis infection (TBI) worldwide. Currently, TBI diagnosis includes tuberculin skin test and the blood-based interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) release assays, with Qiagen QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT) being among those most widely utilized. We evaluated Qiagen's newer QFT platforms commercially available in a prospective cohort of tuberculosis contacts. A substantial agreement was obtained between the current QFT-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the new QFT-chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) platform, although QFT-CLIA provided higher concentrations of IFN-γ, leading to a 16.6% higher positivity rate. We highlight that both platforms may not be directly interchangeable and that further validation is required. Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu