Structured Reporting of Superficial Soft Tissue Masses on Ultrasonography: A Closed-Loop Clinical Audit From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan.
Autor: | Asif MA; Radiology and Medical Imaging, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK., Zahid AS; Surgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, PAK., Naseer A; Radiology and Medical Imaging, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK., Khan MUU; Surgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK., Bhatti Z; Surgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK., Khan MWW; Radiology and Medical Imaging, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK., Nizami MFK; Surgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK., Shehzad K; Radiology and Medical Imaging, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK., Younas UA; Surgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK., Ahmad H; Surgery, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK., Mehmood Qadri H; Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, PAK., Bilal S; Radiology and Medical Imaging, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Cureus [Cureus] 2024 Jun 07; Vol. 16 (6), pp. e61884. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 07 (Print Publication: 2024). |
DOI: | 10.7759/cureus.61884 |
Abstrakt: | Background Among all the modalities of diagnostic radiology, ultrasonography is considered the least invasive one. However, this benefit usually comes at the cost of its subjective evaluation since it is purely a dynamic diagnostic modality. Thus, instead of ultrasonography, most clinicians usually rely on the report written by the radiologist. Objective The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical practices of ultrasound reporting of superficial soft tissue masses. Materials and methods A closed-loop retrospective and prospective study was conducted at the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore between December 2023 and March 2024. In the pre-intervention phase, a randomly collected sample of 100 ultrasound reports documenting superficial soft tissue masses were included in the study and judged against standard criteria set by the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR). The intervention phase included regular presentations, identification of problems, and designing of preformed reporting forms. Post-intervention assessments were based on the judgment of 100 ultrasound reports in each cycle twice. Intervention and post-intervention assessments were done twice to correct the ongoing practices. Results During the pre-intervention phase, the ultrasound reports issued by the department of study showed only 41.5% compliance with the RCR structured reporting guidelines. However, after the first and second post-intervention phases, this percentage increased up to 98.3%. Overall, we observed a compliance difference of 56.5% between the pre-intervention and second post-intervention phases. Conclusion Integration of methods, such as briefing the residents on RCR guidelines, displaying parameters, and making structured report templates available, can greatly increase adherence to RCR guidelines for structured ultrasonography reporting. It also greatly enhances the comprehensiveness and reliability of ultrasonography reports for clinicians. Clinical audits should be routinely practiced in the settings of radiology. Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. (Copyright © 2024, Asif et al.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |