Probiotic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 Improved Growth of Juvenile Trout.
Autor: | Ponomareva EN; Federal Research Center, Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Rostov-on-Don 344006, Russia.; Center for Agrobiotechnology, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don 344002, Russia., Sorokina MN; Federal Research Center, Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Rostov-on-Don 344006, Russia., Grigoriev VA; Federal Research Center, Southern Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Rostov-on-Don 344006, Russia., Mazanko M; Center for Agrobiotechnology, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don 344002, Russia., Chistyakov VA; Center for Agrobiotechnology, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don 344002, Russia.; Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don 344006, Russia., Rudoy DV; Center for Agrobiotechnology, Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don 344002, Russia. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Food science of animal resources [Food Sci Anim Resour] 2024 Jul; Vol. 44 (4), pp. 805-816. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 01. |
DOI: | 10.5851/kosfa.2023.e75 |
Abstrakt: | The aim of this study was to evaluate a new Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 probiotic as a feed additive for farmed trout. Final weight, absolute and average daily gain of fish, and average daily growth rate were higher in the group that received the probiotic than in the control group (p<0.05). Moreover, the probiotic-fed trout had more intense growth rates than the control group (higher by 15.7%; p<0.05). A decrease in feed ratio was also observed in the group that received probiotic (25% decrease; p<0.05), indicating more efficient digestion and assimilation of feed. In general, the introduction of probiotic in the feed did not adversely affect the functional status of the fish. In young trout of the control group, when assessing the general chemical composition of the organism in the muscle tissue revealed significantly (p≤0.001) higher level of moisture content by 5.1% and lower by 11.0% dry matter content. In muscle, the protein content was higher by 1.33% (p≤0.001) and fat content by 2.1% (p≤0.001) in experimental fish. Generally, Lactobacilli, Enterococcus, Vibrio, Bacillus , and coliform bacteria were found in the intestinal samples of rainbow trout. Significant reliable difference (p≤0.05) between the samples of experimental and control groups was noted in the content of Bacillus bacteria. In the control group, 5.0±0.4×10 3 CFU/g was detected, while in the experimental group 8.4±0.8×10 4 CFU/g. Overall, the data indicate that probiotic bacteria B. amyloliquefaciens B-1895 has no adverse effect on selected microorganisms in the study fish. Competing Interests: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. (© Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |