Assessing the Correlation between Allostatic Load and False-Positive Image-Guided Breast Biopsies.

Autor: Lee M; Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA., Nguyen B; Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA., Jung J; Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA., Razzak E; Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA., Oluyemi ET; Department of Radiology, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA., McDonald ES; Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Miles RC; Department of Radiology, Denver Health, Denver, CO, USA., Sadigh G; Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA., Carlos RC; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of women's health (2002) [J Womens Health (Larchmt)] 2024 Sep; Vol. 33 (9), pp. 1259-1266. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 08.
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0039
Abstrakt: Background: Allostatic load (AL) is the accumulation of physiological dysregulation attributed to repeated activation of the stress response over a lifetime. We assessed the utility of AL as a prognostic measure for high-risk benign breast biopsy pathology results. Method: Eligible patients were women 18 years or older, with a false-positive outpatient breast biopsy between January and December 2022 at a tertiary academic health center. AL was calculated using 12 variables representing four physiological systems: cardiovascular (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein); metabolic (body mass index, albumin, and hemoglobin A1C); renal (creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate); and immune (white blood cell count). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between AL before biopsy and breast biopsy outcomes controlling for patients' sociodemographics. Results: In total, 170 women were included (mean age, 54.1 ± 12.9 years): 89.4% had benign and 10.6% had high-risk pathologies (radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion, atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, or lobular carcinoma in-situ). A total of 56.5% were White, 24.7% Asian, and 17.1% other races. A total of 32.5% identified as Hispanic. The mean breast cancer risk score using the Tyrer-Cuzick model was 11.9 ± 7.0. In multivariable analysis, with every one unit increase in AL, the probability of high-risk pathology increased by 37% (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.03, 1.81; p = 0.03). No significant association was seen between high-risk pathology and age, ethnicity, breast cancer risk, or area deprivation index. Conclusion: Our findings support that increased AL, a biological marker of stress, is associated with high-risk pathology among patients with false-positive breast biopsy results.
Databáze: MEDLINE