Computed tomography diagnosis of pulmonary infarction in acute pulmonary embolism.
Autor: | Kaptein FHJ; Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. Electronic address: F.H.J.Kaptein@lumc.nl., Stöger JL; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands., van Dam LF; Department of Emergency Medicine, Franciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands., Ninaber MK; Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands., Mertens BJA; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands., Huisman MV; Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands., Klok FA; Department of Medicine - Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands., Kroft LJM; Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | Thrombosis research [Thromb Res] 2024 Sep; Vol. 241, pp. 109071. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 26. |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.109071 |
Abstrakt: | Introduction: Pulmonary infarction is a common sequela of pulmonary embolism (PE) but lacks a diagnostic reference standard. CTPA in the setting of acute PE does not reliably differentiate infarction from other consolidations, such as reversible alveolar hemorrhage or atelectasis. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy for recognizing pulmonary infarction on CT in the acute phase of PE, with follow-up CT as reference. Materials and Methods: Initial and follow-up CT scans of 33 patients with acute PE were retrospectively assessed. Two radiologists independently evaluated the presence and size of suspected pulmonary infarction on the initial CT. Confirmation of infarction was established by detection of residual densities on follow-up CT. Sensitivity, specificity and interobserver variability were calculated. Results: In total, 60 presumed infarctions were found in 32 patients, of which 34 infarctions in 21 patients could be confirmed at follow-up. On patient-level, observers' sensitivity/specificity were 91 %/9 %, and 73 %/46 %, respectively, with interobserver agreement by Kappa's coefficient of 0.17. Confirmed infarctions were usually larger than false positive lesions (median approximate volume of 6.6 mL [IQR 0.84-21.3] vs. 1.3 mL [IQR 0.57-6.5], p = 0.040), but still small. An occluding thrombus in a supplying vessel was predictive for confirmed infarction (OR 11, 95%CI 2.1-55), but was not discriminative. Conclusions: Pulmonary infarction is a common finding in acute PE, and generally small. Radiological identification of infarction was challenging, with considerable interobserver variability. Complete obstruction of the supplying (sub)segmental pulmonary artery was found as the strongest predictor for pulmonary infarction but was not demonstrated to be discriminative. Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: F.A.K. has received research support from Bayer, BMS, BSCI, MSD, Leo Pharma, Actelion, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, The Dutch Thrombosis Association, The Dutch Heart Foundation and the Horizon Europe Program, all paid to his institution and independent of the current work. M.V.H. reports unrestricted grant support from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW), and unrestricted grant support and fees for presentations from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer-BMS, Bayer Health Care, Aspen, Daiichi-Sankyo, all outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |