What is needed for improved uptake and adoption of digital aftercare programs by cancer survivors: a mixed methods study applying the COM-B model.

Autor: van Deursen L; Department of National Health and Health Care, Center for Public Health, Health Care and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands. liza.van.deursen@rivm.nl.; National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, the Netherlands. liza.van.deursen@rivm.nl., van der Vaart R; Department of National Health and Health Care, Center for Public Health, Health Care and Society, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Antonie Van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.; Centre of Expertise Health Innovation, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, the Netherlands., Chavannes NH; National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, the Netherlands.; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands., Aardoom JJ; National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, the Netherlands.; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice [J Cancer Surviv] 2024 Jul 04. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 04.
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01635-x
Abstrakt: Introduction: Cancer survivors face physical, lifestyle, psychological, and psychosocial challenges. Despite the availability of aftercare services, survivors still have unmet needs. Digital aftercare programs may offer support, but their use is limited. This study aimed to examine what is needed to improve uptake and adoption of these programs. Additionally, it explored sociodemographic and clinical variables that may influence these needs.
Methods: A mixed-methods approach was used, involving qualitative interviews and a questionnaire. The research was guided by the COM-B model of behaviour, which considers capability, opportunity, and motivation crucial for behaviour. Qualitative analysis was performed using the framework method. Statistical analyses involved descriptive statistics and regression analysis.
Results: Fourteen cancer survivors were interviewed, and 213 participants completed the questionnaire. Findings indicated that most respondents had a positive or neutral attitude towards digital aftercare programs, believing these could address their cancer-related challenges. Still, only a small percentage had experience with them, and most were unaware of their existence. Many expressed a desire to be informed about them. Some were uncertain about their effectiveness. Others were concerned about a lack of reimbursement. No significant influence of the sociodemographic and clinical variables was found.
Conclusion: Cancer survivors are generally positive about digital aftercare programs but are often unaware of their availability. Raising awareness, clarifying their value, and providing support and reimbursement could enhance uptake and adoption.
Implications for Cancer Survivors: The current insights can help improve participation in digital aftercare programs, ultimately fostering health, well-being, and quality of life of cancer survivors.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz: