Reporting quality of published reviews of commercial and publicly available mobile health apps (mHealth app reviews): a scoping review protocol.

Autor:	Gasteiger N; Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK norina.gasteiger@manchester.ac.uk.; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK., Norman G; Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK.; NIHR Innovation Observatory, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK., Grainger R; Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand., Eost-Telling C; Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK., Jones D; Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., Ali SM; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., van der Veer SN; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK.; Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., Ford CR; Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., Hall A; Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., Law K; Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; The Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK., Byerly M; The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kansas, USA., Davies A; Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK., Paripoorani D; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK.; EMERGING Research Team, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK., Shi C; Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK., Dowding D; Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jazyk:	angličtina
Zdroj:	BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2024 Jul 04; Vol. 14 (7), pp. e083364. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 04.
DOI:	10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083364
Abstrakt:	Introduction: Reviews of commercial and publicly available smartphone (mobile) health applications (mHealth app reviews) are being undertaken and published. However, there is variation in the conduct and reporting of mHealth app reviews, with no existing reporting guidelines. Building on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we aim to develop the Consensus for APP Review Reporting Items (CAPPRRI) guidance, to support the conduct and reporting of mHealth app reviews. This scoping review of published mHealth app reviews will explore their alignment, deviation, and modification to the PRISMA 2020 items for systematic reviews and identify a list of possible items to include in CAPPRRI. Method and Analysis: We are following the Joanna Briggs Institute approach and Arksey and O'Malley's five-step process. Patient and public contributors, mHealth app review, digital health research and evidence synthesis experts, healthcare professionals and a specialist librarian gave feedback on the methods. We will search SCOPUS, CINAHL Plus, AMED, EMBASE, Medline, APA PsycINFO and the ACM Digital Library for articles reporting mHealth app reviews and use a two-step screening process to identify eligible articles. Information on whether the authors have reported, or how they have modified the PRISMA 2020 items in their reporting, will be extracted. Data extraction will also include the article characteristics, protocol and registration information, review question frameworks used, information about the search and screening process, how apps have been evaluated and evidence of stakeholder engagement. This will be analysed using a content synthesis approach and presented using descriptive statistics and summaries. This protocol is registered on OSF (https://osf.io/5ahjx). Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal publications (shared on our project website and on the EQUATOR Network website where the CAPPRRI guidance has been registered as under development), conference presentations and blog and social media posts in lay language. Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared. (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)
Databáze:	MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu