EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: 2024 update on the diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.
Autor: | Malpica L; Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA., Marques-Piubelli ML; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA., Beltran BE; Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima, Peru., Chavez JC; Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA., Miranda RN; Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA., Castillo JJ; Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. |
---|---|
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Zdroj: | American journal of hematology [Am J Hematol] 2024 Oct; Vol. 99 (10), pp. 2002-2015. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 03. |
DOI: | 10.1002/ajh.27430 |
Abstrakt: | Disease Overview: Epstein Barr virus-positive (EBV+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified (NOS) is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma associated with EBV infection included in the WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms since 2016. Although historically associated to poor prognosis, outcomes seem to have improved in the era of chemoimmunotherapy. Diagnosis: The diagnosis is established through meticulous pathological evaluation. Detection of EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) is the standard diagnostic method. The ICC 2022 specifies EBV+ DLBCL, NOS as occurring when >80% of malignant cells express EBER, whereas the WHO-HAEM5 emphasizes that the majority of tumor cells should be EBER positive without setting a defined threshold. The differential diagnosis includes plasmablastic lymphoma, DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation, primary effusion lymphoma, among others. Risk-Stratification: The International Prognostic Index (IPI) and the Oyama score can be used for risk-stratification. The Oyama score includes age >70 years and presence of B symptoms. The expression of CD30 and PD-1/PD-L1 are emerging as potential adverse but targetable biomarkers. Management: Patients with EBV+ DLBCL, NOS, should be staged and managed following similar guidelines than patients with EBV-negative DLBCL. EBV+ DLBCL, NOS, however, might have a worse prognosis than EBV-negative DLBCL in the era of chemoimmunotherapy. Therefore, inclusion of patients in clinical trials when available is recommended. There is an opportunity to study and develop targeted therapy in the management of patients with EBV+ DLBCL, NOS. (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.) |
Databáze: | MEDLINE |
Externí odkaz: |