Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden.

Autor: Fredriksson M; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, 751 22, Sweden. mio.fredriksson@pubcare.uu.se., Holmström IK; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, 751 22, Sweden.; School of Health, Care and Social Work, Division of Caring Sciences and Health Care Pedagogics, Mälardalen University, Box 883, Västerås, 721 23, Sweden., Höglund AT; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, 751 22, Sweden., Fleron E; Akutmottagningen för gynekologi vid Akademiska sjukhuset, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, 751 85, Sweden., Mattebo M; School of Health, Care and Social Work, Division of Caring Sciences and Health Care Pedagogics, Mälardalen University, Box 883, Västerås, 721 23, Sweden.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Reproductive health [Reprod Health] 2024 Jul 02; Vol. 21 (1), pp. 97. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jul 02.
DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01831-z
Abstrakt: Background: Today, person-centred care is seen as a cornerstone of health policy and practice, but accommodating individual patient preferences can be challenging, for example involving caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR). The aim of this study was to explore Swedish health professionals' perspectives on CSMR and analyse them with regard to potential conflicts that may arise from person-centred care, specifically in relation to shared decision-making.
Methods: A qualitative study using both inductive and deductive content analysis was conducted based on semi-structured interviews. It was based on a purposeful sampling of 12 health professionals: seven obstetricians, three midwives and two neonatologists working at different hospitals in southern and central Sweden. The interviews were recorded either in a telephone call or in a video conference call, and audio files were deleted after transcription.
Results: In the interviews, twelve types of expressions (sub-categories) of five types of conflicts (categories) between shared decision-making and CSMR emerged. Most health professionals agreed in principle that women have the right to decide over their own body, but did not believe this included the right to choose surgery without medical indications (patient autonomy). The health professionals also expressed that they had to consider not only the woman's current preferences and health but also her future health, which could be negatively impacted by a CSMR (treatment quality and patient safety). Furthermore, the health professionals did not consider costs in the individual decision, but thought CSMR might lead to crowding-out effects (avoiding treatments that harm others). Although the health professionals emphasised that every CSMR request was addressed individually, they referred to different strategies for avoiding arbitrariness (equality and non-discrimination). Lastly, they described that CSMR entailed a multifaceted decision being individual yet collective, and the use of birth contracts in order to increase a woman's sense of security (an uncomplicated decision-making process).
Conclusions: The complex landscape for handling CSMR in Sweden, arising from a restrictive approach centred on collective and standardised solutions alongside a simultaneous shift towards person-centred care and individual decision-making, was evident in the health professionals' reasoning. Although most health professionals emphasised that the mode of delivery is ultimately a professional decision, they still strived towards shared decision-making through information and support. Given the different views on CSMR, it is of utmost importance for healthcare professionals and women to reach a consensus on how to address this issue and to discuss what patient autonomy and shared decision-making mean in this specific context.
(© 2024. The Author(s).)
Databáze: MEDLINE
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje