Implicit measures of suicide vulnerability: Investigating suicide-related information-processing biases and a deficit in behavioral impulse control in a high-risk sample and healthy controls.

Autor: Brüdern J; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: juliane.bruedern@medizin.uni-leipzig.de., Spangenberg L; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany., Stein M; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Switzerland; Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland., Forkmann T; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany., Schreiber D; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany., Stengler K; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Helios Park Hospital Leipzig, Germany., Gold H; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany., Glaesmer H; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Germany.
Jazyk: angličtina
Zdroj: Behaviour research and therapy [Behav Res Ther] 2024 Sep; Vol. 180, pp. 104601. Date of Electronic Publication: 2024 Jun 25.
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104601
Abstrakt: Objective: Relevant implicit markers of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) have only been studied in isolation with mixed evidence. This is the first study that investigated a suicide attentional bias, a death-identity bias and a deficit in behavioral impulsivity in a high-risk sample and healthy controls.
Method: We administered the Death Implicit Association Test, the Modified Suicide Stroop Task, and a Go/No-Go Task to inpatient suicide ideators (n = 42), suicide attempters (n = 40), and community controls (n = 61).
Results: Suicide ideators and attempters showed a suicide attentional bias and a death-identity bias compared to healthy controls. Ideators and attempters did not differ in these implicit information-processing biases. Notably, only attempters were more behaviorally impulsive compared to controls; however, ideators and attempters did not significantly differ in behavioral impulsivity. Moreover, implicit scores were positively intercorrelated in the total sample.
Conclusion: In line with the Cognitive Model of Suicide, ideators and attempters display suicide-related information processing biases, which can be considered as implicit cognitive markers of suicide vulnerability. Furthermore, attempters have elevated levels of behavioral impulsiveness. These results are highly relevant in the context of crisis intervention strategies and warrant further research.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
Databáze: MEDLINE